Literature DB >> 18423657

Does how much and how you pay matter? Evidence from the inpatient rehabilitation care prospective payment system.

Neeraj Sood1, Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin2, José J Escarce3.   

Abstract

We use the implementation of a new prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) to investigate the effect of changes in marginal and average reimbursement on costs. The results show that the IRF PPS led to a significant decline in costs and length of stay. Changes in marginal reimbursement associated with the move from a cost-based system to a PPS led to a 7-11% reduction in costs. The elasticity of costs with respect to average reimbursement ranged from 0.26 to 0.34. Finally, the IRF PPS had little or no impact on mortality or the rate of return to community residence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423657     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  16 in total

1.  The effect of prospective payment on admission and treatment policy: evidence from inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Authors:  Neeraj Sood; Peter J Huckfeldt; David C Grabowski; Joseph P Newhouse; José J Escarce
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Medicare payment reform and provider entry and exit in the post-acute care market.

Authors:  Peter J Huckfeldt; Neeraj Sood; John A Romley; Alessandro Malchiodi; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Effects of payment reform in more versus less competitive markets.

Authors:  Neeraj Sood; Abby Alpert; Kayleigh Barnes; Peter Huckfeldt; José J Escarce
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Effects of Medicare payment reform: evidence from the home health interim and prospective payment systems.

Authors:  Peter J Huckfeldt; Neeraj Sood; José J Escarce; David C Grabowski; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Medicare's bundled payment pilot for acute and postacute care: analysis and recommendations on where to begin.

Authors:  Neeraj Sood; Peter J Huckfeldt; José J Escarce; David C Grabowski; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Change in inpatient rehabilitation admissions for individuals with traumatic brain injury after implementation of the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system.

Authors:  Jeanne M Hoffman; Elena Donoso Brown; Leighton Chan; Sureyya Dikmen; Nancy Temkin; Kathleen R Bell
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Rehospitalization During 9 Months After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Flora M Hammond; Susan D Horn; Randall J Smout; Ronald T Seel; Cynthia L Beaulieu; John D Corrigan; Ryan S Barrett; Nora Cullen; Teri Sommerfeld; Murray E Brandstater
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  The residential history file: studying nursing home residents' long-term care histories(*).

Authors:  Orna Intrator; Jeffrey Hiris; Katherine Berg; Susan C Miller; Vince Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Effects of competition on the cost and quality of inpatient rehabilitation care under prospective payment.

Authors:  Carrie Hoverman Colla; José J Escarce; Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Social Support and Actual Versus Expected Length of Stay in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities.

Authors:  Zakkoyya H Lewis; Catherine Cooper Hay; James E Graham; Yu-Li Lin; Amol M Karmarkar; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.