Literature DB >> 18423071

Cancer stem cell heterogeneity in hereditary breast cancer.

Max S Wicha.   

Abstract

The cancer stem cell hypothesis proposes that tumors arise in stem or progenitor cells generating in tumors driven by a subcomponent that retains cancer stem cell properties. Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that the BRCA1 gene involved in hereditary breast cancer plays a role in breast stem cell function. Furthermore, studies using mouse BRCA1 knockout models provide evidence for the existence of heterogeneous cancer stem cell populations in tumors generated in these mice. Although these populations may arise from different stem/progenitor cells, they share the expression of a common set of stem cell regulatory genes and show similar characteristics in in vitro mammosphere assays and xenograft models. Furthermore, these 'cancer stem cells' display resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. These studies suggest that breast tumors may display intertumor stem cell heterogeneity. Despite this heterogeneity, cancer stem cells may share common characteristics that can be used for their identification and for therapeutic targeting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423071      PMCID: PMC2397530          DOI: 10.1186/bcr1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


In a recent publication, Wright and colleagues [1] used a mouse knockout model of BRCA1 to demonstrate cellular heterogeneity of cancer stem cells. They generated 16 cell lines from five independent BRCA1Δexon 11/p53+/- mouse mammary tumors. They then examined the expression of cell-surface markers associated with cancer stem cells in these cell lines. Interestingly, cells derived from one tumor contained populations that were characterized as CD44+/CD24- and that displayed stem cell properties, whereas cells derived from another tumor contained a cancer stem cell population that was characterized by CD133 expression. The CD44+/CD24- phenotype previously has been described as identifying a cell population with stem cell properties in human breast tumors [2]. Sheridan and colleagues [3] recently reported that a number of basal mammary carcinoma cell lines contain a CD44+/CD24- cell population, whereas luminal cell lines do not. In contrast to human cancer cells, normal mouse mammary stem cells have been reported to have a CD24+ phenotype [4]. Although CD133 previously has not been reported to be expressed on breast cancer stem cells, this marker is expressed on a variety of other human cancer stem cells, including those of the brain, prostate, and pancreas. Interestingly, Wright and colleagues [1] found no overlap between the CD44+/CD24- and the CD133+ cell populations. This suggests that there may be heterogeneity within stem cell populations in BRCA1 tumors. As has previously been proposed for sporadic breast tumors, this heterogeneity may potentially result from different cells of origin [5]. The cancer stem cell hypothesis proposes that tumors arise in either normal stem or progenitor cells through the disregulation of self-renewal processes. This results in tumors that are driven by a cellular subcomponent that retains stem cell properties. Recently, our group reported that BRCA1 functions as a regulator of breast stem cell fate [6]. This suggests the possibility that the heterogeneity of stem cells reported by Wright and colleagues represents different cells of origin in tumors that contain CD44+/CD24- stem cells and those that contain CD133+ stem cells. Despite the fact that there was no overlap in expression of CD44+/CD24- and CD133+ cell populations in these cell lines, both cancer stem cell populations overexpressed the stem cell genes Oct4, Notch1, ALDH1, Fgfr1, and Sox1. This is consistent with our recent report that ALDH1 is a marker of both normal and malignant human mammary stem cells [7]. Furthermore, this suggests that a common set of 'stemness' genes may be shared between heterogeneous populations of cancer stem cells. Wright and colleagues used both in vitro assays as well as xenograft models to demonstrate the stem cell properties of the CD44+/CD24- and CD133+ cell populations. Both of these populations form mammospheres in vitro, a characteristic shared by normal [8] and malignant [9] mammary stem cells. Interestingly, cells cultured as mammospheres or those with stem cell markers show resistance to chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin compared with the bulk of the cell population. The resistance of breast cancer stem cells to both radiation [10] and chemotherapy [11] has also been reported by other investigators. In addition, the proportion of cells characterized as CD44+/CD24low significantly increases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer [11], demonstrating the clinical relevance of these concepts. Although transporters such as BCRP are overexpressed in some stem cells [12], Wright and colleagues [1] did not find an increase in expression of ABC transporters in either stem cell population. Thus, the mechanisms of drug resistance in these cells remains to be elucidated. Other potential mechanisms of chemoresistance of cancer stem cells include overexpression of chemotherapy metabolizing enzymes such as aldehyde dehydrogenase 1, changes in cell cycle kinetics, and over-expression of anti-apoptotic proteins [13]. A number of therapeutic approaches are being developed to therapeutically target breast cancer stem cells. Wright and colleagues demonstrate that the HSP90 inhibitor 17-DMAG sensitizes these cells to chemotherapy. These in vitro experiments have potential clinical implications since HSP90 inhibitors are currently in clinical trials. Furthermore, these studies indicate the feasibility of using in vitro mammosphere assays for the screening of compounds that are able to target cancer stem cells. In summary, recent studies suggest that both hereditary and sporadic breast tumors may originate through the disregulation of self-renewal pathways in normal mammary stem and/or progenitor cells. The resulting tumors may be driven by heterogeneous populations of cancer stem cells. This heterogeneity may reflect different cells of origin and/or different mutation profiles in these cells. These heterogeneous cancer stem cell populations, in turn, may determine the overall molecular phenotype of tumors as assessed by molecular profiling. The development of suitable in vitro and mouse models should accelerate research aimed at identifying these diverse cancer stem cell populations. This should facilitate the identification of suitable targets for the development of strategies aimed at cancer prevention and therapy.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.
  13 in total

1.  In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Gabriela Dontu; Wissam M Abdallah; Jessica M Foley; Kyle W Jackson; Michael F Clarke; Mari J Kawamura; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell.

Authors:  Mark Shackleton; François Vaillant; Kaylene J Simpson; John Stingl; Gordon K Smyth; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Li Wu; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Jane E Visvader
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The multidrug resistance transporter ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein 1) effluxes Hoechst 33342 and is overexpressed in hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Min Kim; Heth Turnquist; John Jackson; Magda Sgagias; Ying Yan; Maokai Gong; Michael Dean; John G Sharp; Kenneth Cowan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  The response of CD24(-/low)/CD44+ breast cancer-initiating cells to radiation.

Authors:  Tiffany M Phillips; William H McBride; Frank Pajonk
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties.

Authors:  Dario Ponti; Aurora Costa; Nadia Zaffaroni; Graziella Pratesi; Giovanna Petrangolini; Danila Coradini; Silvana Pilotti; Marco A Pierotti; Maria Grazia Daidone
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Selective targeting of cancer stem cells: a new concept in cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Hasan Korkaya; Max S Wicha
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 8.  Breast cancer, stem/progenitor cells and the estrogen receptor.

Authors:  Gabriela Dontu; Dorraya El-Ashry; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.015

9.  ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  Christophe Ginestier; Min Hee Hur; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Florence Monville; Julie Dutcher; Marty Brown; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Patrice Viens; Celina G Kleer; Suling Liu; Anne Schott; Dan Hayes; Daniel Birnbaum; Max S Wicha; Gabriela Dontu
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis.

Authors:  Carol Sheridan; Hiromitsu Kishimoto; Robyn K Fuchs; Sanjana Mehrotra; Poornima Bhat-Nakshatri; Charles H Turner; Robert Goulet; Sunil Badve; Harikrishna Nakshatri
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  30 in total

1.  Localization of CD44 and CD90 positive cells to the invasive front of breast tumors.

Authors:  Vera S Donnenberg; Albert D Donnenberg; Ludovic Zimmerlin; Rodney J Landreneau; Rohit Bhargava; Ryan A Wetzel; Per Basse; Adam M Brufsky
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.058

2.  Permanently blocked stem cells derived from breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Gangadharan B Sajithlal; Kristi Rothermund; Fang Zhang; David J Dabbs; Jean J Latimer; Stephen G Grant; Edward V Prochownik
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 3.  Systems biology and genomics of breast cancer.

Authors:  Charles M Perou; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  From bench to bedside: the growing use of translational research in cancer medicine.

Authors:  Erin M Goldblatt; Wen-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  EZH2 promotes expansion of breast tumor initiating cells through activation of RAF1-β-catenin signaling.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Chang; Jer-Yen Yang; Weiya Xia; Chun-Te Chen; Xiaoming Xie; Chi-Hong Chao; Wendy A Woodward; Jung-Mao Hsu; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Mien-Chie Hung
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Isolation of tumour stem-like cells from benign tumours.

Authors:  Q Xu; X Yuan; P Tunici; G Liu; X Fan; M Xu; J Hu; J Y Hwang; D L Farkas; K L Black; J S Yu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Avoiding Pitfalls in the Statistical Analysis of Heterogeneous Tumors.

Authors:  David E Axelrod; Naomi Miller; Judith-Anne W Chapman
Journal:  Biomed Inform Insights       Date:  2009-01-01

Review 8.  Role of cancer stem cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Gregory Sergeant; Hugo Vankelecom; Lies Gremeaux; Baki Topal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  The breast cancer and the environment research centers: transdisciplinary research on the role of the environment in breast cancer etiology.

Authors:  Robert A Hiatt; Sandra Z Haslam; Janet Osuch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The cancer stem cell concept in progression of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Zhuo Georgia Chen
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.