BACKGROUND: Although blood utilization has been under considerable scrutiny for the past two decades, particularly for surgery, studies comparing perioperative blood transfusion practices between countries are rare, and the evolution of international standards remains unknown. Therefore, the objective of this evaluation was to compare the perioperative transfusion of blood components in cardiac surgery in multiple centers in different countries. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Transfusion practice was investigated prospectively in 70 centers among 16 countries. A total of 5065 randomly selected cardiac surgery patients of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Epidemiology II (EPI II) Study were evaluated. Utilization of red blood cells (RBCs), fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets (PLTs) was assessed daily, before, during, and after surgery until hospital discharge. RESULTS: Intraoperative RBC transfusion varied from 9 to 100 percent among the 16 countries, and 25 to 87 percent postoperatively (percentage of transfused patients). Similarly, frequency of transfusion of FFP varied from 0 to 98 percent intraoperatively and 3 to 95 percent postoperatively, and PLT transfusion from 0 to 51 and 0 to 39 percent, respectively. Moreover, there were not only marked differences in transfusion rates between centers in different countries but also in interinstitutional comparison of multiple centers within countries. CONCLUSION: In cardiac surgical patients, marked variability in transfusion practice exists between centers in various countries and suggests differences in perioperative practice patterns as well as possible inappropriate use. International standardization of perioperative practice patterns as well as transfusion regimes appears necessary.
BACKGROUND: Although blood utilization has been under considerable scrutiny for the past two decades, particularly for surgery, studies comparing perioperative blood transfusion practices between countries are rare, and the evolution of international standards remains unknown. Therefore, the objective of this evaluation was to compare the perioperative transfusion of blood components in cardiac surgery in multiple centers in different countries. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Transfusion practice was investigated prospectively in 70 centers among 16 countries. A total of 5065 randomly selected cardiac surgery patients of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Epidemiology II (EPI II) Study were evaluated. Utilization of red blood cells (RBCs), fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets (PLTs) was assessed daily, before, during, and after surgery until hospital discharge. RESULTS: Intraoperative RBC transfusion varied from 9 to 100 percent among the 16 countries, and 25 to 87 percent postoperatively (percentage of transfused patients). Similarly, frequency of transfusion of FFP varied from 0 to 98 percent intraoperatively and 3 to 95 percent postoperatively, and PLT transfusion from 0 to 51 and 0 to 39 percent, respectively. Moreover, there were not only marked differences in transfusion rates between centers in different countries but also in interinstitutional comparison of multiple centers within countries. CONCLUSION: In cardiac surgical patients, marked variability in transfusion practice exists between centers in various countries and suggests differences in perioperative practice patterns as well as possible inappropriate use. International standardization of perioperative practice patterns as well as transfusion regimes appears necessary.
Authors: Donald S Likosky; Robert A Baker; Timothy A Dickinson; Daniel J FitzGerald; M Filip De Somer; Robert C Groom; David FitzGerald; Kenneth G Shann; Michael Poullis; Bruce D Spiess; Karim Jabr; Mark T Lucas; James D Ferguson; Shahna L Bronson Journal: J Extra Corpor Technol Date: 2015-06
Authors: Anton Camaj; Darin B Zahuranec; Gaetano Paone; Barbara R Benedetti; Warren D Behr; Marc A Zimmerman; Min Zhang; Robert S Kramer; Jason Penn; Patricia F Theurer; Theron A Paugh; Milo Engoren; Alphonse DeLucia; Richard L Prager; Donald S Likosky Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: P Gueret; S Combe; C Krezel; E Fuseau; P L M van Giersbergen; M Petitou; E Neuhart Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-10-15 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Timothy J George; Claude A Beaty; Arman Kilic; Kara A Haggerty; Steven M Frank; William J Savage; Glenn J Whitman Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Francesco Viola; F William Mauldin; Xiefan Lin-Schmidt; Doris M Haverstick; Michael B Lawrence; William F Walker Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2009-10-25 Impact factor: 3.786