Literature DB >> 18422805

Comparison of 2-h versus 3-h enteral feeding in extremely low birth weight infants, commencing after birth.

Mario Rüdiger1, Sandra Herrmann, Gerd Schmalisch, Roland R Wauer, Hannes Hammer, Edda Tschirch.   

Abstract

AIM: Immaturity is associated with problems in enteral nutrition of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Different time intervals between single feedings are used; however, no data are available to show a benefit of either regime.
METHODS: In January 2001 enteral feeding regime was changed from 2-h to 3-h intervals. In a retrospective study charts were analysed for all ELBW infants during a period of 2 years prior (01/99-12/00) and after (08/01-07/03) changing the feeding regime.
RESULTS: Forty-two in the 2-h group (gestational age 27 +/- 2.1, birth weight 797 +/-150) and 32 infants in 3-h (GA 26.9 +/- 1.8 weeks, BW 809 +/- 148 g) were included. Median (range) time until complete enteral feeding (26 (7 to 69) vs. 20 (12 to 58) days) was not statistical different. There were no differences with respect to enteral morbidity (NEC, abdominal surgery, feeding intolerance), length of stay (84 +/- 23 vs. 86 +/- 26 days), growth parameters or weight at discharge. Total duration of phototherapy and average length of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support were significantly (p < 0.01) longer in the 3-h feeding group.
CONCLUSION: Weight gain and time until complete enteral nutrition are similar in 2-h and 3-h feeding regimes. Data suggest an advantage of 2-h feedings concerning the length of CPAP and phototherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18422805     DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00774.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  4 in total

1.  Three-hourly feeding intervals are associated with faster advancement in very preterm infants.

Authors:  Elaine Chu; Sue Freck; Lishi Zhang; Kushal Y Bhakta; Michel Mikhael
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Three-hourly versus two-hourly feeding interval in stable preterm infants: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jogender Kumar; Jitendra Meena; Pradeep Debata; MJeeva Sankar; Praveen Kumar; Arvind Shenoi
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Short versus long feeding interval for bolus feedings in very preterm infants.

Authors:  Nor Rosidah Ibrahim; Hans Van Rostenberghe; Jacqueline J Ho; Ariffin Nasir
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-19

Review 4.  Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Sourabh Dutta; Balpreet Singh; Lorraine Chessell; Jennifer Wilson; Marianne Janes; Kimberley McDonald; Shaneela Shahid; Victoria A Gardner; Aune Hjartarson; Margaret Purcha; Jennifer Watson; Chris de Boer; Barbara Gaal; Christoph Fusch
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.