Literature DB >> 18421047

Asparaginase may influence dexamethasone pharmacokinetics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Lei Yang1, John C Panetta, Xiangjun Cai, Wenjian Yang, Deqing Pei, Cheng Cheng, Nancy Kornegay, Ching-Hon Pui, Mary V Relling.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dexamethasone is used widely in oncology, but pharmacokinetic studies are lacking. We evaluated dexamethasone pharmacokinetics in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed 214 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received 418 courses of oral dexamethasone (8 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 and 8 of reinduction. Extensive asparaginase use preceded reinduction in the 101 children in the standard/high-risk treatment arm but not in the 113 children in the low-risk treatment arm. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and disposition was fit to dexamethasone plasma concentrations by using maximum a posteriori probability estimation; we evaluated covariates by using linear mixed models.
RESULTS: Interpatient and intrapatient variabilities in apparent clearance were substantial; they were 46% and 53%, respectively. Variability was explained by the serum albumin concentration (P < .0001), concomitant use of fentanyl (P = .008) and ketoconazole (P = .03), and age (P = .006). Apparent clearance was higher in the low-risk arm (P < .001) and was related to a greater serum albumin concentration (P < .001) and to a lower exposure to asparaginase than in the standard/high-risk arm. Hypoalbuminemia, a biomarker of asparaginase activity, was associated with a lower dexamethasone apparent clearance (P = .04) in patients in the standard/high-risk arm that was more pronounced in those not allergic to asparaginase. Ethnicity or gender did not explain apparent clearance variability.
CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics are highly variable and are related to the concurrent use of particular drugs, age, and treatment intensity. Patients allergic to asparaginase may be doubly disadvantaged: they not only suffer from diminished exposure to asparaginase but also, by maintaining high clearance of dexamethasone, may experience fewer antileukemic effects of dexamethasone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18421047     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  61 in total

1.  Clinical utility and implications of asparaginase antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  C Liu; J D Kawedia; C Cheng; D Pei; C A Fernandez; X Cai; K R Crews; S C Kaste; J C Panetta; W P Bowman; S Jeha; J T Sandlund; W E Evans; C-H Pui; M V Relling
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  A dyad of lymphoblastic lysosomal cysteine proteases degrades the antileukemic drug L-asparaginase.

Authors:  Naina Patel; Shekhar Krishnan; Marc N Offman; Marcin Krol; Catherine X Moss; Carly Leighton; Frederik W van Delft; Mark Holland; Jizhong Liu; Seema Alexander; Clare Dempsey; Hany Ariffin; Monika Essink; Tim O B Eden; Colin Watts; Paul A Bates; Vaskar Saha
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Asparaginase formulation impacts hypertriglyceridemia during therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Emily R Finch; Colton A Smith; Wenjian Yang; Yiwei Liu; Nancy M Kornegay; John C Panetta; Kristine R Crews; Alejandro R Molinelli; Cheng Cheng; Deqing Pei; Laura B Ramsey; Seth E Karol; Hiroto Inaba; John T Sandlund; Monika Metzger; William E Evans; Sima Jeha; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for osteonecrosis in children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Signe Sloth Mogensen; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Kathrine Grell; Birgitte Klug Albertsen; Peder Skov Wehner; Peter Kampmann; Thomas Leth Frandsen
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Energy balance and fitness in adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Kirsten K Ness; James P DeLany; Sue C Kaste; Daniel A Mulrooney; Ching-Hon Pui; Wassim Chemaitilly; Robyn E Karlage; Jennifer Q Lanctot; Carrie R Howell; Lu Lu; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Pharmacogenomics of adverse effects of anti-leukemic agents in children.

Authors:  Mary V Relling
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-01

7.  Effect of alternate-week versus continuous dexamethasone scheduling on the risk of osteonecrosis in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the CCG-1961 randomised cohort trial.

Authors:  Leonard A Mattano; Meenakshi Devidas; James B Nachman; Harland N Sather; Stephen P Hunger; Peter G Steinherz; Paul S Gaynon; Nita L Seibel
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacology in the adolescent oncology patient.

Authors:  Gareth J Veal; Christine M Hartford; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Hiroto Inaba; Mel Greaves; Charles G Mullighan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Mutations in subunit interface and B-cell epitopes improve antileukemic activities of Escherichia coli asparaginase-II: evaluation of immunogenicity in mice.

Authors:  Ranjit Kumar Mehta; Shikha Verma; Rashmirekha Pati; Mitali Sengupta; Biswajit Khatua; Rabindra Kumar Jena; Sudha Sethy; Santosh K Kar; Chitra Mandal; Klaus H Roehm; Avinash Sonawane
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.