PURPOSE: Dexamethasone is used widely in oncology, but pharmacokinetic studies are lacking. We evaluated dexamethasone pharmacokinetics in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed 214 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received 418 courses of oral dexamethasone (8 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 and 8 of reinduction. Extensive asparaginase use preceded reinduction in the 101 children in the standard/high-risk treatment arm but not in the 113 children in the low-risk treatment arm. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and disposition was fit to dexamethasone plasma concentrations by using maximum a posteriori probability estimation; we evaluated covariates by using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Interpatient and intrapatient variabilities in apparent clearance were substantial; they were 46% and 53%, respectively. Variability was explained by the serum albumin concentration (P < .0001), concomitant use of fentanyl (P = .008) and ketoconazole (P = .03), and age (P = .006). Apparent clearance was higher in the low-risk arm (P < .001) and was related to a greater serum albumin concentration (P < .001) and to a lower exposure to asparaginase than in the standard/high-risk arm. Hypoalbuminemia, a biomarker of asparaginase activity, was associated with a lower dexamethasone apparent clearance (P = .04) in patients in the standard/high-risk arm that was more pronounced in those not allergic to asparaginase. Ethnicity or gender did not explain apparent clearance variability. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics are highly variable and are related to the concurrent use of particular drugs, age, and treatment intensity. Patients allergic to asparaginase may be doubly disadvantaged: they not only suffer from diminished exposure to asparaginase but also, by maintaining high clearance of dexamethasone, may experience fewer antileukemic effects of dexamethasone.
PURPOSE:Dexamethasone is used widely in oncology, but pharmacokinetic studies are lacking. We evaluated dexamethasone pharmacokinetics in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed 214 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received 418 courses of oral dexamethasone (8 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 and 8 of reinduction. Extensive asparaginase use preceded reinduction in the 101 children in the standard/high-risk treatment arm but not in the 113 children in the low-risk treatment arm. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and disposition was fit to dexamethasone plasma concentrations by using maximum a posteriori probability estimation; we evaluated covariates by using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Interpatient and intrapatient variabilities in apparent clearance were substantial; they were 46% and 53%, respectively. Variability was explained by the serum albumin concentration (P < .0001), concomitant use of fentanyl (P = .008) and ketoconazole (P = .03), and age (P = .006). Apparent clearance was higher in the low-risk arm (P < .001) and was related to a greater serum albumin concentration (P < .001) and to a lower exposure to asparaginase than in the standard/high-risk arm. Hypoalbuminemia, a biomarker of asparaginase activity, was associated with a lower dexamethasone apparent clearance (P = .04) in patients in the standard/high-risk arm that was more pronounced in those not allergic to asparaginase. Ethnicity or gender did not explain apparent clearance variability. CONCLUSION:Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics are highly variable and are related to the concurrent use of particular drugs, age, and treatment intensity. Patients allergic to asparaginase may be doubly disadvantaged: they not only suffer from diminished exposure to asparaginase but also, by maintaining high clearance of dexamethasone, may experience fewer antileukemic effects of dexamethasone.
Authors: C Liu; J D Kawedia; C Cheng; D Pei; C A Fernandez; X Cai; K R Crews; S C Kaste; J C Panetta; W P Bowman; S Jeha; J T Sandlund; W E Evans; C-H Pui; M V Relling Journal: Leukemia Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Naina Patel; Shekhar Krishnan; Marc N Offman; Marcin Krol; Catherine X Moss; Carly Leighton; Frederik W van Delft; Mark Holland; Jizhong Liu; Seema Alexander; Clare Dempsey; Hany Ariffin; Monika Essink; Tim O B Eden; Colin Watts; Paul A Bates; Vaskar Saha Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Emily R Finch; Colton A Smith; Wenjian Yang; Yiwei Liu; Nancy M Kornegay; John C Panetta; Kristine R Crews; Alejandro R Molinelli; Cheng Cheng; Deqing Pei; Laura B Ramsey; Seth E Karol; Hiroto Inaba; John T Sandlund; Monika Metzger; William E Evans; Sima Jeha; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Kirsten K Ness; James P DeLany; Sue C Kaste; Daniel A Mulrooney; Ching-Hon Pui; Wassim Chemaitilly; Robyn E Karlage; Jennifer Q Lanctot; Carrie R Howell; Lu Lu; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson Journal: Blood Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Leonard A Mattano; Meenakshi Devidas; James B Nachman; Harland N Sather; Stephen P Hunger; Peter G Steinherz; Paul S Gaynon; Nita L Seibel Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 41.316