Literature DB >> 18420972

Bone mineral density and breaking strength of White Leghorns housed in conventional, modified, and commercially available colony battery cages.

M J Jendral1, D R Korver, J S Church, J J R Feddes.   

Abstract

Limited opportunity for movement and load-bearing exercise for conventionally caged laying hens leads to bone loss and increased susceptibility to osteoporosis, bone fractures, and cage layer fatigue, all of which compromise hen welfare and have negative consequences for production. The objective of this study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) and strength measures of White Leghorns housed in conventional battery cages (CONV), cages modified to incorporate a nest box and perch (MOD), and commercially available, furnished colony cages with (CWDB) or without (CWODB) a raised dust bath. Hens reared on floor litter were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 cage systems at 19 wk of age. Hen-day production and egg quality were measured between 20 and 64 wk. At 65 wk, hens were killed, and right femur, tibia, and humerus were excised. Bone mineral density was assessed using quantitative computed tomography, and breaking strength was measured with an Instron Materials Tester. In the femur and tibia, CONV hens exhibited lower total BMD, bone mass, cortical bone area, cortical bone mass, and bone-breaking strength than CWDB, CWODB, and MOD hens. Density and cross-sectional area of bone in the trabecular space was highest in CONV. In the humerus, total and cortical BMD and mass and breaking strength values were higher for colony-housed birds than hens in CONV and MOD. The MOD birds did not exhibit increased humeral BMD or strength measures over CONV hens. These findings provide evidence that hens housed in modified and colony cages, furnished systems that promote load-bearing movement, are better able to preserve cortical structural bone than conventionally caged hens and simultaneously have stronger bones. Furthermore, inclusion of raised amenities that encourage wing loading is necessary to reduce humeral cortical bone loss. The overall absence of correlation between egg production or quality and bone quality measures also suggests that improved bone quality in CWDB, CWODB, and MOD furnished cages is not the result of lowered egg production or quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18420972     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2007-00192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  Effect of rearing environment on bone growth of pullets.

Authors:  P Regmi; T S Deland; J P Steibel; C I Robison; R C Haut; M W Orth; D M Karcher
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  One Alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol Improves Growth Performance, Tibia Quality, and Meat Color of Broilers Fed Calcium- and Phosphorus-Deficient Diets.

Authors:  J C Han; Y L Wang; H X Qu; F Liang; J L Zhang; C X Shi; X L Zhang; L Li; Q Xie; C L Wang; Y Y Yan; X S Dong; Y H Cheng
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Bone-remodeling transcript levels are independent of perching in end-of-lay white leghorn chickens.

Authors:  Maurice D Dale; Erin M Mortimer; Santharam Kolli; Erik Achramowicz; Glenn Borchert; Steven A Juliano; Scott Halkyard; Nick Seitz; Craig Gatto; Patricia Y Hester; David A Rubin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Opportunities for exercise during pullet rearing, Part I: Effect on the musculoskeletal characteristics of pullets.

Authors:  T M Casey-Trott; D R Korver; M T Guerin; V Sandilands; S Torrey; T M Widowski
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Relationship between Bone Stability and Egg Production in Genetically Divergent Chicken Layer Lines.

Authors:  Simon Jansen; Ulrich Baulain; Christin Habig; Annett Weigend; Ingrid Halle; Armin Manfred Scholz; Henner Simianer; Ahmad Reza Sharifi; Steffen Weigend
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Evaluation of Relative Bioavailability of 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol to Cholecalciferol for Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  J C Han; G H Chen; J G Wang; J L Zhang; H X Qu; C M Zhang; Y F Yan; Y H Cheng
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Opportunities for exercise during pullet rearing, Part II: Long-term effects on bone characteristics of adult laying hens at the end-of-lay.

Authors:  T M Casey-Trott; D R Korver; M T Guerin; V Sandilands; S Torrey; T M Widowski
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: Performance and well-being.

Authors:  T M Widowski; L J Caston; M E Hunniford; L Cooley; S Torrey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Radiographic examination of keel bone damage in living laying hens of different strains kept in two housing systems.

Authors:  Beryl Katharina Eusemann; Ulrich Baulain; Lars Schrader; Christa Thöne-Reineke; Antonia Patt; Stefanie Petow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Early-life conditioning strategies to reduce dietary phosphorus in broilers: underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  A S Valable; M P Létourneau-Montminy; S Klein; L Lardic; F Lecompte; S Metayer-Coustard; N Même; G Page; M J Duclos; A Narcy
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2020-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.