RATIONALE: Skeletal muscle strength and bulk are reduced in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and influence quality of life, survival, and utilization of health care resources. Exercise training during pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can reverse some of these effects. In athletes and healthy elderly individuals, dietary creatine supplementation (CrS) has been shown to augment high-intensity exercise training, thereby increasing muscle mass. OBJECTIVES: This article examines the effect of CrS on functional exercise capacity and muscle performance in people with COPD. METHODS:One hundred subjects with COPD (mean [SD] age, 68.2 [8.2] yr; FEV(1), 44.0 [19.6] %predicted) were randomized to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial of CrS during 7 weeks of PR encompassing aerobic and resistance exercises. Subjects ingested creatine (22 g/d loading for 5 d; maintenance, 3.76 g/d throughout PR) or placebo. Baseline, postloading, and postrehabilitation measurements included pulmonary function, body composition, peripheral muscle strength, and functional performance (shuttle walking tests). A volunteer subgroup (n = 44) had pre- and postloading quadriceps muscle biopsies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Eighty subjects completed the trial (38 creatine, 42 placebo). All outcome measures significantly improved after PR. There were no significant differences between groups post-PR (mean [SD] change in incremental shuttle walk distance, 84 [79] m in the creatine group vs. 83.8 [60] m in the placebo group; P = 1.0; knee extensor work, 19.2 [16] Nm [Newton meters] in the creatine group vs. 19.5 [17] Nm in the placebo group; P = 0.9). Muscle biopsies showed evidence of creatine uptake. CONCLUSIONS: This adequately powered, randomized, placebo-controlled trial shows that CrS does not augment the substantial training effect of multidisciplinary PR for patients with COPD. Clinical trial registered with https://portal.nihr.ac.uk/Pages/NRRArchiveSearch.aspx (NO123138126).
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Skeletal muscle strength and bulk are reduced in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and influence quality of life, survival, and utilization of health care resources. Exercise training during pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can reverse some of these effects. In athletes and healthy elderly individuals, dietary creatine supplementation (CrS) has been shown to augment high-intensity exercise training, thereby increasing muscle mass. OBJECTIVES: This article examines the effect of CrS on functional exercise capacity and muscle performance in people with COPD. METHODS: One hundred subjects with COPD (mean [SD] age, 68.2 [8.2] yr; FEV(1), 44.0 [19.6] %predicted) were randomized to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial of CrS during 7 weeks of PR encompassing aerobic and resistance exercises. Subjects ingested creatine (22 g/d loading for 5 d; maintenance, 3.76 g/d throughout PR) or placebo. Baseline, postloading, and postrehabilitation measurements included pulmonary function, body composition, peripheral muscle strength, and functional performance (shuttle walking tests). A volunteer subgroup (n = 44) had pre- and postloading quadriceps muscle biopsies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty subjects completed the trial (38 creatine, 42 placebo). All outcome measures significantly improved after PR. There were no significant differences between groups post-PR (mean [SD] change in incremental shuttle walk distance, 84 [79] m in the creatine group vs. 83.8 [60] m in the placebo group; P = 1.0; knee extensor work, 19.2 [16] Nm [Newton meters] in the creatine group vs. 19.5 [17] Nm in the placebo group; P = 0.9). Muscle biopsies showed evidence of creatine uptake. CONCLUSIONS: This adequately powered, randomized, placebo-controlled trial shows that CrS does not augment the substantial training effect of multidisciplinary PR for patients with COPD. Clinical trial registered with https://portal.nihr.ac.uk/Pages/NRRArchiveSearch.aspx (NO123138126).
Authors: John E Morley; Josep M Argiles; William J Evans; Shalender Bhasin; David Cella; Nicolaas E P Deutz; Wolfram Doehner; Ken C H Fearon; Luigi Ferrucci; Marc K Hellerstein; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Herbert Lochs; Neil MacDonald; Kathleen Mulligan; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Mary Ellen Posthauer; Filippo Rossi Fanelli; Morrie Schambelan; Annemie M W J Schols; Michael W Schuster; Stefan D Anker Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: François Maltais; Marc Decramer; Richard Casaburi; Esther Barreiro; Yan Burelle; Richard Debigaré; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Frits Franssen; Ghislaine Gayan-Ramirez; Joaquim Gea; Harry R Gosker; Rik Gosselink; Maurice Hayot; Sabah N A Hussain; Wim Janssens; Micheal I Polkey; Josep Roca; Didier Saey; Annemie M W J Schols; Martijn A Spruit; Michael Steiner; Tanja Taivassalo; Thierry Troosters; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Peter D Wagner Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Raolat M Abdulai; Tina Jellesmark Jensen; Naimish R Patel; Michael I Polkey; Paul Jansson; Bartolomé R Celli; Stephen I Rennard Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Michael Kingsley; Daniel Cunningham; Laura Mason; Liam P Kilduff; Jane McEneny Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: Scott C Forbes; Darren G Candow; Sergej M Ostojic; Michael D Roberts; Philip D Chilibeck Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Kylie K Harmon; Jeffrey R Stout; David H Fukuda; Patrick S Pabian; Eric S Rawson; Matt S Stock Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 5.717