Literature DB >> 18419938

Integrating novel technologies to fabricate smart scaffolds.

L Moroni1, J R de Wijn, C A van Blitterswijk.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering aims at restoring or regenerating a damaged tissue by combining cells, derived from a patient biopsy, with a 3D porous matrix functioning as a scaffold. After isolation and eventual in vitro expansion, cells are seeded on the 3D scaffolds and implanted directly or at a later stage in the patient's body. 3D scaffolds need to satisfy a number of requirements: (i) biocompatibility, (ii) biodegradability and/or bioresorbability, (iii) suitable mechanical properties, (iv) adequate physicochemical properties to direct cell-material interactions matching the tissue to be replaced and (v) ease in regaining the original shape of the damaged tissue and the integration with the surrounding environment. Still, it appears to be a challenge to satisfy all the aforementioned requisites with the biomaterials and the scaffold fabrication technologies nowadays available. 3D scaffolds can be fabricated with various techniques, among which rapid prototyping and electrospinning seem to be the most promising. Rapid prototyping technologies allow manufacturing scaffolds with a controlled, completely accessible pore network--determinant for nutrient supply and diffusion--in a CAD/CAM fashion. Electrospinning (ESP) allows mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM) environment of the cells and can provide fibrous scaffolds with instructive surface properties to direct cell faith into the proper lineage. Yet, these fabrication methods have some disadvantages if considered alone. This review aims at summarizing conventional and novel scaffold fabrication techniques and the biomaterials used for tissue engineering and drug-delivery applications. A new trend seems to emerge in the field of scaffold design where different scaffolds fabrication technologies and different biomaterials are combined to provide cells with mechanical, physicochemical and biological cues at the macro-, micro- and nano-scale. If merged together, these integrated technologies may lead to the generation of a new set of 3D scaffolds that satisfies all of the scaffolds' requirements for tissue-engineering applications and may contribute to their success in a long-term scenario.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18419938     DOI: 10.1163/156856208784089571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  31 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterial strategies for stem cell maintenance during in vitro expansion.

Authors:  Xiang-Zhen Yan; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; Sanne K Both; Pi-Shan Yang; John A Jansen; Fang Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ericka M Bueno; Julie Glowacki
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  Bone tissue engineering therapeutics: controlled drug delivery in three-dimensional scaffolds.

Authors:  Viviana Mouriño; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling.

Authors:  M Ehrbar; A Sala; P Lienemann; A Ranga; K Mosiewicz; A Bittermann; S C Rizzi; F E Weber; M P Lutolf
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  The famous versus the inconvenient - or the dawn and the rise of 3D-culture systems.

Authors:  Brigitte Altmann; Alexander Welle; Stefan Giselbrecht; Roman Truckenmüller; Eric Gottwald
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Development of a three-dimensional cell culture system based on microfluidics for nuclear magnetic resonance and optical monitoring.

Authors:  Vicent Esteve; Javier Berganzo; Rosa Monge; M Carmen Martínez-Bisbal; Rosa Villa; Bernardo Celda; Luis Fernandez
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 8.  Bone repair cells for craniofacial regeneration.

Authors:  G Pagni; D Kaigler; G Rasperini; G Avila-Ortiz; R Bartel; W V Giannobile
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  3D fiber deposited polymeric scaffolds for external auditory canal wall.

Authors:  Carlos Mota; Mario Milazzo; Daniele Panetta; Luisa Trombi; Vera Gramigna; Piero A Salvadori; Stefano Giannotti; Luca Bruschini; Cesare Stefanini; Lorenzo Moroni; Stefano Berrettini; Serena Danti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Supercritical phase inversion of starch-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Ana Rita C Duarte; João F Mano; Rui L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.