Literature DB >> 18419832

Effective medical education: insights from the Cochrane Library.

Winston G Satterlee1, Robin G Eggers, David A Grimes.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In 2006, the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education highlighted the need for linking educational activities to changes in competence, performance, or patient outcomes. Hence, educational providers increasingly need to know what strategies are effective. The Cochrane Library is widely regarded as the best source of credible evidence concerning health care. The authors searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (issue 4 for 2006) using the search terms "continuing medical education," "medical education," and "continuing education." They conducted a second complementary search of this database by review group (Effective Practice and Organization of Care). Finally, the authors examined the references of recent review articles for Cochrane reviews and found 9 relevant reviews. The most effective educational methods were the most interactive. Combined didactic presentations and workshops were more effective than traditional didactic presentations alone. Medical education was more effective when more than 1 intervention occurred, especially if these interventions occurred over an extended period. Targeted education should focus on changing a behavior that is simple, because effect size is inversely proportional to the complexity of the behavior. In the era of evidence-based medicine, interventions-including educational ones-should reflect the best available evidence. Cochrane reviews of randomized controlled trials of educational methods provide important guidance that often challenges traditional didactic approaches. Integrating the findings from the Cochrane reviews may allow continuing medical education to be more successful in bringing about changes to healthcare providers' behavior. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians. LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to explain the scientific evidence concerning the effectiveness of various techniques used for continuing medical education, state the relative value of such techniques as traditional didactic lectures, conferences led by local opinion leaders, interactive workshops, and educational outreach visits, and identify the value and limitations of teaching critical appraisal skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18419832     DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31816ff661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  17 in total

1.  Beyond prevention: promoting healthy youth development in primary care.

Authors:  Lindsay A Taliaferro; Iris W Borowsky
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Education and benchmarking among physicians may facilitate sick-listing practice.

Authors:  A B Bremander; J Hubertsson; I F Petersson; B Grahn
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

3.  Efficacy of a web-based intervention to improve and sustain knowledge and screening for amblyopia in primary care settings.

Authors:  Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Gerald McGwin; Connie L Kohler; Robert E Kristofco; Raju V Datla; Terry C Wall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Back to School: Quality Improvement through Academic Detailing.

Authors:  Barry Patel
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2011-11

5.  Secure Provider-to-Provider Communication With Electronic Health Record Messaging: An Educational Outreach Study.

Authors:  Kathleen E Walsh; Jessica L Secor; Jon S Matsumura; Margaret L Schwarze; Beth E Potter; Peter Newcomer; Michael K Kim; Christie M Bartels
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.095

6.  Developing professional confidence in the art of prescribing-a randomized controlled study on structured collegial discussions during internship.

Authors:  Johan Lönnbro; Karin Nylén; Susanna M Wallerstedt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Edward A Sickles; Diana L Miglioretti; Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Skin cancer education for primary care physicians: a systematic review of published evaluated interventions.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Goulart; Elizabeth A Quigley; Stephen Dusza; Sarah T Jewell; Gwen Alexander; Maryam M Asgari; Melody J Eide; Suzanne W Fletcher; Alan C Geller; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Martin A Weinstock; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Prenatal Oral Health Counseling by Primary Care Physicians: Results of a National Survey.

Authors:  M Gentry Byrd; Rocio B Quinonez; R Gary Rozier; Ceib Phillips; Marian Mehegan; Ledia Martinez; Kimon Divaris
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-07

10.  Incorporating and evaluating an integrated gender-specific medicine curriculum: a survey study in Dutch GP training.

Authors:  Patrick W Dielissen; Ben J A M Bottema; Petra Verdonk; Toine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.