Literature DB >> 18419591

Free the animals? Investigating attitudes toward animal testing in Britain and the United States.

Viren Swami1, Adrian Furnham, Andrew N Christopher.   

Abstract

In this study, 185 British and 143 American undergraduates completed a battery of tests that measured attitudes toward animal testing and various individual difference variables. Attitudes toward animal testing factored into two interpretable factors: general attitudes toward animal testing, and animal welfare and conditions of testing. Overall, there was support for animal testing under the right conditions, although there was also concern for the welfare of animals and the conditions under which testing takes place. There were small but significant national difference on both factors (with Americans more positive about testing and less positive about animal welfare), and a significant sex difference on the first factor (women were more negative about testing). Correlation and regression analyses showed that there were few significant individual difference predictors of both factors. These results are discussed in relation to past and future work on attitudes toward animal testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18419591     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00636.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Psychol        ISSN: 0036-5564


  6 in total

1.  The impact of commercialisation on public perceptions of stem cell research: exploring differences across the use of induced pluripotent cells, human and animal embryos.

Authors:  Christine R Critchley; Gordana Bruce; Matthew Farrugia
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  Public Attitudes toward Animal Research: A Review.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Ormandy; Catherine A Schuppli
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Attitudes toward animals, and how species and purpose affect animal research justifiability, among undergraduate students and faculty.

Authors:  Eric P Sandgren; Robert Streiffer; Jennifer Dykema; Nadia Assad; Jackson Moberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?

Authors:  Eric P Sandgren; Robert Streiffer; Jennifer Dykema; Nadia Assad; Jackson Moberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Are They Really Trying to Save Their Buddy? The Anthropomorphism of Animal Epimeletic Behaviours.

Authors:  Cédric Sueur; Marie-Amélie Forin-Wiart; Marie Pelé
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Influence of animal pain and distress on judgments of animal research justifiability among university undergraduate students and faculty.

Authors:  Eric P Sandgren; Robert Streiffer; Jennifer Dykema; Nadia Assad; Jackson Moberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.