Literature DB >> 1841958

Response properties of cones from the retina of the tiger salamander.

R J Perry1, P A McNaughton.   

Abstract

1. Spectral sensitivity measurements using the suction electrode technique reveal three types of cone in the retina of the tiger salamander, showing maximum sensitivity at wavelengths 610 nm (red-sensitive cone), 444 nm (blue-sensitive cone) and below 400 nm (UV-sensitive cone). 2. The absolute sensitivities of red- and blue-sensitive cones to flashes of optimal wavelength are 0.022 and 0.33 pA photon-1 micron 2 respectively. 3. The time-to-peak of the dim flash response and the recovery of membrane current after a flash of any intensity are fastest in red-sensitive and slowest in blue-sensitive cones. 4. In blue- and UV-sensitive cones the flash response peaks progressively earlier as the flash strength is increased, as in rods. In red-sensitive cones, however, bright flash responses take longer to peak than dim flash responses. 5. In all three cone types, voltage clamping at -40 mV reduces the time-to-peak of the response to a bright flash, showing that the rising phase of the bright flash response is normally limited by the time constant of the cell. Under voltage clamp, all cones show a decrease in time-to-peak with increasing flash intensity. 6. Voltage clamping red-sensitive cones reveals two components of the rising phase of the response to a bright flash. Most of the current is rapidly suppressed by a bright flash, and represents the closure of light-sensitive channels. The residual current decays with a mean time constant of 20 ms, and is probably attributable to the decline of electrogenic Na(+)-Ca2+, K+ exchange. The amplitude of this exchange current suggests that the proportion of the dark current carried by calcium ions is greater in red-sensitive cones than in rods of the same species. 7. In UV-sensitive cones, a prominent oscillation of light-sensitive current is observed during the recovery from flashes of intermediate intensity. A similar, but slower and less prominent oscillation is usually seen in blue-sensitive cones. 8. When a red-sensitive cone is voltage clamped an oscillation similar to those in the other two cone types is revealed. An underswing of up to 2 pA is also observed after recovery from intermediate or bright flashes in the majority of red-sensitive cones, and voltage clamping increases the amplitude of this underswing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1841958      PMCID: PMC1181389          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  35 in total

1.  Electrical properties of the light-sensitive conductance of rods of the salamander Ambystoma tigrinum.

Authors:  D A Baylor; B J Nunn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The effects of phosphodiesterase inhibitors and lanthanum ions on the light-sensitive current of toad retinal rods.

Authors:  L Cervetto; P A McNaughton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Sodium-dependent calcium extrusion and sensitivity regulation in retinal cones of the salamander.

Authors:  K Nakatani; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Visual pigments of frog and tadpole (Rana pipiens).

Authors:  P A Liebman; G Entine
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Kinetics and components of the flash photocurrent of isolated retinal rods of the larval salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum.

Authors:  W H Cobbs; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Control of light-sensitive current in salamander rods.

Authors:  A L Hodgkin; B J Nunn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Calcium and magnesium fluxes across the plasma membrane of the toad rod outer segment.

Authors:  K Nakatani; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cyclic GMP increases photocurrent and light sensitivity of retinal cones.

Authors:  W H Cobbs; A E Barkdoll; E N Pugh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Sep 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Absorption spectra and linear dichroism of some amphibian photoreceptors.

Authors:  F I Hárosi
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  69 in total

1.  Evidence that ultraviolet markings are associated with patterns of molecular gene flow.

Authors:  R S Thorpe; M Richard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Na(+)-Ca(2+)-K(+) currents measured in insect cells transfected with the retinal cone or rod Na(+)-Ca(2+)-K(+) exchanger cDNA.

Authors:  J Z Sheng; C F Prinsen; R B Clark; W R Giles; P P Schnetkamp
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Fraction of the dark current carried by Ca(2+) through cGMP-gated ion channels of intact rod and cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  T Ohyama; D H Hackos; S Frings; V Hagen; U B Kaupp; J I Korenbrot
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Isomerization and oxidation of vitamin a in cone-dominant retinas: a novel pathway for visual-pigment regeneration in daylight.

Authors:  Nathan L Mata; Roxana A Radu; Richard C Clemmons; Gabriel H Travis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  A kinetic analysis of mouse rod and cone photoreceptor responses.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; Norianne T Ingram; Khris G Griffis; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Elevated energy requirement of cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Norianne T Ingram; Gordon L Fain; Alapakkam P Sampath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Breaking the covalent bond--a pigment property that contributes to desensitization in cones.

Authors:  Vladimir J Kefalov; Maureen E Estevez; Massahiro Kono; Patrice W Goletz; Rosalie K Crouch; M Carter Cornwall; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Rod and cone opsin families differ in spectral tuning domains but not signal transducing domains as judged by saturated evolutionary trace analysis.

Authors:  Karen L Carleton; Tyrone C Spady; Rick H Cote
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Light responses of primate and other mammalian cones.

Authors:  Li-Hui Cao; Dong-Gen Luo; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.