Literature DB >> 18418831

Monitoring of beet armyworm resistance to spinosad and methoxyfenozide in Mexico.

Aniceto Osorio1, Ana M Martínez, Marcela I Schneider, Ovidio Díaz, José L Corrales, Mayra C Avilés, Guy Smagghe, Samuel Pineda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resistance to spinosad and methoxyfenozide has been studied in several insect pests, but there is a lack of information on Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) in Mexico. Therefore, evidence for the development of resistance in this pest to both compounds was examined. The effects of methoxyfenozide on reproductive parameters of S. exigua adults were also determined.
RESULTS: Third instars from a field population were exposed for 24 h to the LC(50) of spinosad or methoxyfenozide for over six generations (G(2)-G(7)). No significant reduction in susceptibility to either compound was detected for up to five generations. In G(7), LC(50) values for insects exposed to spinosad and methoxyfenozide were respectively 2.75-fold and 1.25-fold greater than for G(1) larvae. Oral treatment with methoxyfenozide reduced the fecundity and fertility of G(7) adults, confirming sublethal effects on reproduction. Finally, five populations (Se-La Floriza, Se-Lazareto, Se-Bachigualato, Se-Los Agustinos and Se-Villa de Arista) of S. exigua were collected from fields in three states of Mexico for resistance monitoring to spinosad and methoxyfenozide. With the exception of Se-Villa de Arista, the other populations showed significant resistance to spinosad, with resistance ratios between 16- and 37-fold, compared with a susceptible laboratory colony. In contrast, only one population (Se-Lazareto) showed significant resistance to methoxyfenozide (13-fold).
CONCLUSION: Resistance management programmes should be established, particularly in areas where S. exigua has developed resistance to spinosad.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18418831     DOI: 10.1002/ps.1594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  6 in total

1.  Monitoring resistance to spinosad in the melon fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) in Hawaii and Taiwan.

Authors:  Ju-Chun Hsu; David S Haymer; Ming-Yi Chou; Hai-Tung Feng; Hsaio-Han Chen; Yu-Bing Huang; Ronald F L Mau
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

2.  Influence of Diet, Sex, and Viral Infections on the Gut Microbiota Composition of Spodoptera exigua Caterpillars.

Authors:  María Martínez-Solís; María Carmen Collado; Salvador Herrero
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Lethal and behavioral effects of synthetic and organic insecticides on Spodoptera exigua and its predator Podisus maculiventris.

Authors:  Ancidériton Antonio de Castro; Jesusa Crisostomo Legaspi; Wagner de Souza Tavares; Robert L Meagher; Neil Miller; Lambert Kanga; Muhammad Haseeb; José Eduardo Serrão; Carlos Frederico Wilcken; José Cola Zanuncio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Toxicity and biochemical impact of methoxyfenozide/spinetoram mixture on susceptible and methoxyfenozide-selected strains of Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Fatma S Ahmed; Yasser S Helmy; Walid S Helmy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Interactive Effects of Temperature and Plant Host on the Development Parameters of Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Rameswor Maharjan; Jeongjoon Ahn; Hwijong Yi
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The Mechanism by Which Dodecyl Dimethyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride Increased the Toxicity of Chlorpyrifos to Spodoptera exigua.

Authors:  Li Cui; Huizhu Yuan; Daibin Yang; Changhui Rui; Wei Mu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.