Literature DB >> 18418807

Effects of pedal type and pull-up action during cycling.

G Mornieux1, B Stapelfeldt, A Gollhofer, A Belli.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different shoe-pedal interfaces and of an active pulling-up action during the upstroke phase on the pedalling technique. Eight elite cyclists (C) and seven non-cyclists (NC) performed three different bouts at 90 rev . min (-1) and 60 % of their maximal aerobic power. They pedalled with single pedals (PED), with clipless pedals (CLIP) and with a pedal force feedback (CLIPFBACK) where subjects were asked to pull up on the pedal during the upstroke. There was no significant difference for pedalling effectiveness, net mechanical efficiency (NE) and muscular activity between PED and CLIP. When compared to CLIP, CLIPFBACK resulted in a significant increase in pedalling effectiveness during upstroke (86 % for C and 57 % NC, respectively), as well as higher biceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscle activity (p < 0.001). However, NE was significantly reduced (p < 0.008) with 9 % and 3.3 % reduction for C and NC, respectively. Consequently, shoe-pedal interface (PED vs. CLIP) did not significantly influence cycling technique during submaximal exercise. However, an active pulling-up action on the pedal during upstroke increased the pedalling effectiveness, while reducing net mechanical efficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18418807     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  11 in total

1.  Effect of "Pose" cycling on efficiency and pedaling mechanics.

Authors:  Thomas Korff; Graham Fletcher; David Brown; Lee M Romer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Changing relative crank angle increases the metabolic cost of leg cycling.

Authors:  Asher H Straw; Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Assessment of Three-Dimensional Trunk Kinematics and Muscle Activation during Cycling with Independent Cranks.

Authors:  Eric Bourdon; Matthew Mavor; Dean C Hay
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Between-subject variability of muscle synergies during a complex motor skill.

Authors:  Julien Frère; François Hug
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Altered muscle coordination when pedaling with independent cranks.

Authors:  François Hug; Florian Boumier; Sylvain Dorel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  The effects of vibration on efficiency in off-road cyclists.

Authors:  Tolga Aksit; Arzu On; Gorkem Aybars Balci; Ozgur Ozkaya
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 7.  Caveats and Recommendations to Assess the Validity and Reliability of Cycling Power Meters: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Anthony Bouillod; Georges Soto-Romero; Frederic Grappe; William Bertucci; Emmanuel Brunet; Johan Cassirame
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Subject specific muscle synergies and mechanical output during cycling with arms or legs.

Authors:  Théo Cartier; Laurent Vigouroux; Elke Viehweger; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Feedback of mechanical effectiveness induces adaptations in motor modules during cycling.

Authors:  Cristiano De Marchis; Maurizio Schmid; Daniele Bibbo; Anna Margherita Castronovo; Tommaso D'Alessio; Silvia Conforto
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  How to assess performance in cycling: the multivariate nature of influencing factors and related indicators.

Authors:  A Margherita Castronovo; Silvia Conforto; Maurizio Schmid; Daniele Bibbo; Tommaso D'Alessio
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.