| Literature DB >> 18418478 |
Timothy Christie1, Bashir Jiwani, Getnet Asrat, Valentina Montessori, Richard Mathias, Julio Montaner.
Abstract
End-stage liver disease is emerging as a leading cause of death among HIV-positive patients. Historically, an HIV diagnosis was a contraindication for a liver transplant; however, because of the efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV-positive patients have one-year, two-year, and three-year post-transplantation survival rates similar to that of HIV-negative patients. Based on this evidence, HIV-positive patients are now considered eligible for transplantation. However, newly emerging guidelines include the stipulation that HIV-positive patients must be on HAART to be placed on a waiting list for transplantation. The purpose of the present paper is to evaluate the scientific and ethical probity of requiring HIV-positive patients to be on HAART as a condition for being on a liver transplant waiting list. It is argued that the emphasis should be placed on the probability of post-transplantation HAART tolerance, and that concerns about pretransplantation HAART tolerance are of secondary importance.Entities:
Keywords: Ethical decision-making; Ethics; Evidence-based medicine; HIV-positive; Health policy; Liver transplantation
Year: 2006 PMID: 18418478 PMCID: PMC2095053 DOI: 10.1155/2006/286301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ISSN: 1712-9532 Impact factor: 2.471