S Arya1, V Rao, S Juvekar, A K Dcruz. 1. Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. supreeta.arya@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging is an established method for diagnosis and surgical planning of carotid body tumors (CBTs). However no studies have elaborated preoperative objective criteria to predict the Shamblin (surgical) classification of CBTs, an important predictor of vascular morbidity. The purpose of this study was to establish criteria to accurately predict the Shamblin group on preoperative MR imaging for a uniform reporting system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 9 CBTs in 8 consecutive patients who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2007 were reviewed at a tertiary cancer hospital. The surgical records were blinded to the radiologists. A radiologic classification into 3 types (I, II, and III) based on the maximum degree of circumferential contact of the tumor with the internal carotid artery (ICA) was attempted and correlated with the Shamblin group in surgical records. RESULTS: There were 5 type III, 3 type II, and 1 type I tumors. The type I tumor had an ICA maximum circumference of contact less than or equal to 180 degrees , type II tumors had more than 180 degrees and less than 270 degrees , and type III tumors had a maximum circumference of contact of 270 degrees of more. MR imaging accurately predicted the Shamblin group in 8 (100%) of 8 operated tumors. Tumor size and Shamblin group did not have a uniformly predictable relation. CONCLUSIONS: Shamblin group can be predicted preoperatively on MR imaging, and the maximum degree of circumferential contact of the CBT with the ICA on axial images is the criterion to predict the Shamblin group.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging is an established method for diagnosis and surgical planning of carotid body tumors (CBTs). However no studies have elaborated preoperative objective criteria to predict the Shamblin (surgical) classification of CBTs, an important predictor of vascular morbidity. The purpose of this study was to establish criteria to accurately predict the Shamblin group on preoperative MR imaging for a uniform reporting system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 9 CBTs in 8 consecutive patients who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2007 were reviewed at a tertiary cancer hospital. The surgical records were blinded to the radiologists. A radiologic classification into 3 types (I, II, and III) based on the maximum degree of circumferential contact of the tumor with the internal carotid artery (ICA) was attempted and correlated with the Shamblin group in surgical records. RESULTS: There were 5 type III, 3 type II, and 1 type I tumors. The type I tumor had an ICA maximum circumference of contact less than or equal to 180 degrees , type II tumors had more than 180 degrees and less than 270 degrees , and type III tumors had a maximum circumference of contact of 270 degrees of more. MR imaging accurately predicted the Shamblin group in 8 (100%) of 8 operated tumors. Tumor size and Shamblin group did not have a uniformly predictable relation. CONCLUSIONS: Shamblin group can be predicted preoperatively on MR imaging, and the maximum degree of circumferential contact of the CBT with the ICA on axial images is the criterion to predict the Shamblin group.
Authors: Gregory C Kasper; Richard E Welling; Alan R Wladis; Daniel E CaJacob; Andre D Grisham; Thomas A Tomsick; Jack L Gluckman; Patrick E Muck Journal: Vasc Endovascular Surg Date: 2006 Dec-2007 Jan Impact factor: 1.089
Authors: Phillip K Pellitteri; Alessandra Rinaldo; David Myssiorek; C Gary Jackson; Patrick J Bradley; Kenneth O Devaney; Ashok R Shaha; James L Netterville; Johannes J Manni; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: J Gary Maxwell; Samuel W Jones; Ewain Wilson; Cyrus A Kotwall; Tana Hall; Sue Hamann; Carla C Brinker Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: René van den Berg; Abbey Schepers; Francisca T de Bruïne; Lishya Liauw; Bart J A Mertens; Andel G L van der Mey; Mark A van Buchem Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: David M Straughan; Vladimir K Neychev; Samira M Sadowski; Ryan J Ellis; Francine Thomas; Nicholas J Patronas; Karel Pacak; Electron Kebebew; Naris Nilubol Journal: World J Surg Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: R Schneider; J Ukkat; P Nguyen-Thanh; K Lorenz; S Plontke; C Behrmann; C Sekulla; H Dralle Journal: Chirurg Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Julius Griauzde; Joseph J Gemmete; Neeraj Chaudhary; Aditya S Pandey; Steven E Sullivan; Erin L McKean; Lawerence J Marentette Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-06-22 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Carlos Suárez; Juan P Rodrigo; William M Mendenhall; Marc Hamoir; Carl E Silver; Vincent Grégoire; Primož Strojan; Hartmut P H Neumann; Rupert Obholzer; Christian Offergeld; Johannes A Langendijk; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 2.503