Literature DB >> 18416983

Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study.

Grigori Smirnov1, Henri Tuomilehto, Markku Teräsvirta, Juhani Nuutinen, Juha Seppä.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective procedure when treating saccal and postsaccal obstructions of the nasolacrimal pathway. The benefit of silicone tubing after DCR is still controversial. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the necessity of bicanalicular silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR.
METHODS: Forty-six consecutive primary EN-DCR procedures were performed in 42 patients during 2004-2007. The patients were randomized into two study groups according to whether silicone tubing was used or not.
RESULTS: The overall success rate after primary EN-DCR was 89%: with silicone tubes it was 78%, and without silicone tubes it was 100%. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p<0.049). The follow-up period was 6 months and included three follow-up visits: 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. If inserted, the silicone tubes were removed at the 2-month visit.
CONCLUSION: The results of our prospective, randomized study showed that the use of silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR is not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18416983     DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol        ISSN: 1050-6586


  27 in total

1.  Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with radiowave instruments: surgical outcome according to obstruction level.

Authors:  Naohiro Yoshida; Hiromi Kanazawa; Akihiro Shinnabe; Yukiko Iino
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Silicone tube stenting in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Marco Carifi; Bruno Zuberbuhler; Gianluca Carifi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Primary Endonasal DCR Without Stent: Our Experience and Case Series Analysis.

Authors:  Shiv Kumar Raghuwanshi; Sapna Raghuwanshi; Mohit Agarwal; Gaurav Batni
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-06-11

4.  Long-term results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Johannes Zenk; Alexander D Karatzanis; George Psychogios; Katrin Franzke; Michael Koch; Joachim Hornung; George A Velegrakis; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Endoscopic DCR without stents: clinical guidelines and procedure.

Authors:  Basil M N Saeed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Multifactorial assessment is essential to maximize the likelihood of good outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stenting.

Authors:  M I Syed; J Hendry; A J Cain; A T Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Endoscopic DCR: A 10 Years Personal Experience.

Authors:  Basil Mohammednather Saeed
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-07-23

9.  Resolving Perplexity: Comparison of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With and Without Stent.

Authors:  Jasdeep Monga; Yojana Sharma; Girish Mishra; Mehul Patel
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study.

Authors:  F Longari; P Dehgani Mobaraki; A L Ricci; R Lapenna; C Cagini; G Ricci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.