Literature DB >> 18416728

Vivosorb, Bio-Gide, and Gore-Tex as barrier membranes in rat mandibular defects: an evaluation by microradiography and micro-CT.

Pepijn F M Gielkens1, Jurjen Schortinghuis, Johan R de Jong, Gerry M Raghoebar, Boudewijn Stegenga, Ruud R M Bos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine whether a new degradable synthetic barrier membrane (Vivosorb) composed of poly(dl-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone) (PDLLCL) can be useful in implant dentistry and to compare it with collagen and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 192 male Sprague-Dawley rats, a standardized 5 mm circular defect was created through the right angle of the mandible. New bone formation was evaluated by post-mortem microradiography and micro-CT (muCT) imaging. Four groups (control, PDLLCL, collagen, ePTFE) were evaluated at three time intervals (2, 4, and 12 weeks). In the membrane groups the defects were covered; in the control group the defects were left uncovered. Data were analysed using a multiple regression model.
RESULTS: New bone formation could be detected by post-mortem microradiography in 130 samples and by muCT imaging in 112 samples. Bone formation was progressive in 12 weeks, when the mandibular defect was covered with a membrane. Overall, more bone formation was observed underneath the collagen and ePTFE membranes than the PDLLCL membranes.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to uncovered mandibular defects, substantial bone healing was observed in defects covered with a PDLLCL membrane. However, bone formation in PDLLCL-covered defects tended to be less than in the defects covered with collagen or ePTFE. The high variation in the PDLLCL samples at 12 weeks may be caused by the moderate adherence of this membrane to bone compared with collagen. These results indicate that further study is needed to optimize the properties of PDLLCL membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18416728     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01511.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  11 in total

Review 1.  Animal models to study host-bacteria interactions involved in periodontitis.

Authors:  Dana T Graves; Jun Kang; Oelisoa Andriankaja; Keisuke Wada; Carlos Rossa
Journal:  Front Oral Biol       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  3D-printed bi-layered polymer/hydrogel construct for interfacial tissue regeneration in a canine model.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Jamalpour; Amir Yadegari; Farshid Vahdatinia; Leila Mohammadi Amirabad; Shokoofeh Jamshidi; Setareh Shojaei; Abbas Shokri; Erfan Moeinifard; Meisam Omidi; Lobat Tayebi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.687

3.  Comparable efficacy of silk fibroin with the collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects.

Authors:  Jwa-Young Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang; Jin-Hee Ahn; Sang O Park; Hye-Won Shim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  A Bone Sample Containing a Bone Graft Substitute Analyzed by Correlating Density Information Obtained by X-ray Micro Tomography with Compositional Information Obtained by Raman Microscopy.

Authors:  Johann Charwat-Pessler; Maurizio Musso; Alexander Petutschnigg; Karl Entacher; Bernhard Plank; Erik Wernersson; Stefan Tangl; Peter Schuller-Götzburg
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Barrier membranes for tissue regeneration in dentistry.

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Sasaki; Gabriela L Abe; Aonan Li; Pasiree Thongthai; Ririko Tsuboi; Tomoki Kohno; Satoshi Imazato
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2021-05-20

6.  Clinical applications of concentrated growth factors combined with bone substitutes for alveolar ridge preservation in maxillary molar area: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shi-Chen Lin; Xin Li; Hang Liu; Fang Wu; Lian Yang; Ya Su; Jun Li; Shao-Yu Duan
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-11-29

Review 7.  Effect of Different Membranes on Vertical Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mi Zhang; Zili Zhou; Jiahao Yun; Rui Liu; Jie Li; Yimeng Chen; HongXin Cai; Heng Bo Jiang; Eui-Seok Lee; Jianmin Han; Yunhan Sun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  In vivo behaviour of a biodegradable poly(trimethylene carbonate) barrier membrane: a histological study in rats.

Authors:  A C Van Leeuwen; T G Van Kooten; D W Grijpma; R R M Bos
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Rozalia Dimitriou; George I Mataliotakis; Giorgio Maria Calori; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Guided Bone Regeneration with Ammoniomethacrylate-Based Barrier Membranes in a Radial Defect Model.

Authors:  David Kirmayer; Ada Grin; Julia Gefter Shenderovich; Michael Friedman; Jacob Rachmilewitz; Rami Mosheiff; Ron Kenett; Amal Khoury
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.