Literature DB >> 18416261

Visual function and change in quality of life after bilateral refractive lens exchange with the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens.

John F Blaylock1, Zhaomin Si, Sandi Aitchison, Cheryl Prescott.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate vision and quality of life and explore the correlation between vision and change of quality of life after bilateral refractive lens exchange of the Acrysof SA60D3 ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) for correction of ametropia in presbyopic populations.
METHODS: Pre- and postoperatively, the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL) was self-administered by 30 consecutive refractive lens exchange patients, including 19 myopes and 11 hyperopes. The change of NEI-RQL scores was determined for each subscale covering a specific aspect of quality of life. Refraction, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity function were evaluated 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Postoperatively, all patients achieved binocular uncorrected distance and near visual acuity of 20/30 or better. Photopic contrast sensitivity function decreased significantly at high spatial frequencies (P < .05). Overall scores of expectations, activity limitations, dependence on correction, appearance, and satisfaction were significantly higher postoperatively (P < .05). Greater improvement in near vision and dependence on correction was achieved in hyperopes. However, glare scores were significantly lower postoperatively (P < .001). Lower preoperative uncorrected near visual acuity was associated with higher scores for dependence on correction in myopes (r = 0.51, P = .027), and overall patient satisfaction correlated significantly with postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (r = -0.44, P = .015).
CONCLUSIONS: Refractive lens exchange with the ReSTOR IOL in presbyopic patients provided good visual function and better patient satisfaction compared with preoperative corrections. Improvement in vision-related quality of life was most evident in hyperopes. A slight reduction in contrast sensitivity function appears to have no influence on quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18416261     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080301-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  11 in total

1.  Refractive lens exchange with distance-dominant diffractive bifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Luis Fernández-Vega; Susana Ortí; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis combined with diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  M Ouchi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Quality of vision, patient satisfaction and long-term visual function after bilateral implantation of a low addition multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Emilio Pedrotti; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Jacopo Bonetto; Christian Demasi; Francesco Aiello; Carlo Nucci; Cesare Mariotti; Giorgio Marchini
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Predictive factor and kappa angle analysis for visual satisfactions in patients with multifocal IOL implantation.

Authors:  G Prakash; D R Prakash; A Agarwal; D A Kumar; A Agarwal; S Jacob
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Implantation of refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section for cataract eyes complicated with a coexisting ocular pathology.

Authors:  M Ouchi; S Kinoshita
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Spectacle independence and subjective satisfaction of ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens after cataract or presbyopia surgery in two European countries.

Authors:  Béatrice Cochener; Luis Fernández-Vega; Jose F Alfonso; Frédérique Maurel; Juliette Meunier; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-04

7.  [Functional vision training after MIOL implantation].

Authors:  U Mester; M Fahle; G Ott; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  A review of results after implantation of a secondary intraocular lens to correct residual refractive error after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Kjell Gunnar Gundersen; Rick Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-03

9.  Comparison of visual outcomes, spectacles dependence and patient satisfaction of multifocal and accommodative intraocular lenses: innovative perspectives for maximal refractive-oriented cataract surgery.

Authors:  Raffaele Nuzzi; Federico Tridico
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Retreatments after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: an analysis.

Authors:  Kjell Gunnar Gundersen; Sarah Makari; Steffen Ostenstad; Rick Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.