Literature DB >> 18415154

[Continuous administration of opiates with implantable drug delivery systems in patients with intractable non-malignant pain.].

M Winkelmüller1, W Winkelmüller.   

Abstract

The use of implantable systems for intrathecal administration of opioids in chronic pain of non-malignant origin is a controversial subject. Opioid therapy is reserved mainly for pain patients with malignant disease and reduced life-expectancy. The main reasons for this restricted range of indications of chronic subarachnoid administration of opioids are fear of addiction and the build-up of tolerance. During July 1988 and April 1990 we treated 60 patients suffering from pain of non-malignant origin with continuous opioid infusion by implanted pumps. Wishing to find whether opiates can relieve deafferentation pain, we subdivided the different pain syndromes into three groups according to their pathophysiology: nociceptive, neurogenic/neuropathic, and deafferentation pain. After a follow-up period of 11.5+/-7.1 months 47 patients were evaluated. Pain intensity according to the visual analogue scale was reduced in a mean of 79.4% of the patients. Activity level and mood scores as pain-associated parameters were both significantly increased after therapy. Analysis of the McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals that the improved quality of life is attributable to a reduction of affective pain perception more than to sensory discrimination. The best results in terms of pain reduction (82.5%) were obtained in the group of patients with deafferentation pain. This is in contrast to reports in the literature. It seems that neuropathic and deafferentation pain syndroms are susceptible to intrathecal opioids. The initial daily average dose of morphine was 2.6 mg/day, increasing to 6.1 mg/day after 25 months without the development of major tachyphylaxis. the administration of intrathecal opioids by means of implantable systems is justified in carefully selected patients with chronic non-malignant pain. This method should be applied in preference to destructive neurosurgical treatments.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 18415154     DOI: 10.1007/BF02529662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  31 in total

1.  Administration of intraspinal morphine sulfate for the treatment of intractable cancer pain.

Authors:  A G Shetter; M N Hadley; E Wilkinson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Spinal opiates: a review of their effect on spinal function with emphasis on pain processing.

Authors:  T L Yaksh
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1987

3.  Continuous vs. bolus epidural morphine.

Authors:  T Oyama; T Murakawa; S Baba; H Nagao
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1987

4.  Intraspinal narcotics: non-malignant pain.

Authors:  T M Murphy; S Hinds; D Cherry
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1987

5.  Use of epidural opioid 'blockade' as an adjuvant diagnostic procedure.

Authors:  S Arnér; U Lindblom; B Meyerson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  [Use of oral morphine in incurable pain].

Authors:  R Twycross; M Zenz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Analgesia mediated by a direct spinal action of narcotics.

Authors:  T L Yaksh; T A Rudy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Long-term intraventricular infusion of morphine for intractable pain in cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  G C Dennis; R L DeWitty
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Intraventricular morphine produces pain relief, hypothermia, hyperglycaemia and increased prolactin and growth hormone levels in patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  C F Su; M Y Liu; M T Lin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain.

Authors:  S Arnér; B A Meyerson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Continuous intrathecal administration of medication. Special features in anaesthesiology and intensive care].

Authors:  P Felleiter; P Lierz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  M Zenz; M Strumpf; A Willweber-Strumpf
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 3.  [Importance of intrathecal pain therapy].

Authors:  R Likar; W Ilias; H Kloimstein; A Kofler; H G Kress; J Neuhold; M M Pinter; M C Spendel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  [Pumps and ports for analgesic therapy.].

Authors:  H Müller
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.107

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.