Literature DB >> 18414192

Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study.

Nicolas Duport1, Rosemary Ancelle-Park, Marjorie Boussac-Zarebska, Zoé Uhry, Juliette Bloch.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the role of women's sociodemographic and healthcare access characteristics according to breast cancer screening practices (organized, individual or no screening). A cross-sectional study was set up in seven French districts using a self-administered postal questionnaire. Randomization was stratified proportionally on age and urban/rural status in each district separately among attendees and nonattendees to the organized breast cancer screening programme (OS). A total of 5638 women aged 50-74 years returned their questionnaires: 1480 in the attendee OS group and 4158 in the nonattendee group. Among them, 3537 declared having undergone a recent mammography outside the organized programme (individual, IS group) and 621 declared never having undergone a mammography or having done so more than 2 years ago (NS group). Analyses showed a gradient between the three groups (IS, OS and NS, respectively) in their association with breast cancer screening practices considering three factors: an increasing gradient was observed for renunciation of basic healthcare for financial reasons, a decreasing gradient in the regular visit to a medical gynaecologist and having had a Pap smear in the last 3 years. Three other variables that showed a decreasing gradient are: living with a partner, current use of hormone replacement therapy and having had a check-up in the last 5 years. In conclusion, the main differences between breast cancer screening practices were largely associated with difficulties in healthcare access, considering regular gynaecological visits in particular.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18414192     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282b6fde5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  13 in total

1.  Mammography use for breast cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey.

Authors:  Fernanda Dourado; Helena Carreira; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  The contribution of risk factors to the higher incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women with higher levels of education in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition.

Authors:  Gwenn Menvielle; Anton E Kunst; Carla H van Gils; Petra H Peeters; Hendriek Boshuizen; Kim Overvad; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjonneland; Silke Hermann; Rudolf Kaaks; Manuela M Bergmann; Anne-Kathrin Illner; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Antonia Trichopoulou; Domenico Palli; Franco Berrino; Amelia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Anne May; Evelyn Monninkhof; Tonje Braaten; Eiliv Lund; José Ramón Quirós; Eric J Duell; Maria-José Sánchez; Carmen Navarro; Eva Ardanaz; Signe Borgquist; Jonas Manjer; Kay Tee Khaw; Naomi E Allen; Gillian K Reeves; Véronique Chajes; Sabina Rinaldi; Nadia Slimani; Valentina Gallo; Paolo Vineis; Elio Riboli; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The impact of family history of breast cancer on knowledge, attitudes, and early detection practices of Mexican women along the Mexico-US border.

Authors:  Yelena Bird; Matthew P Banegas; John Moraros; Sasha King; Surasri Prapasiri; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-10

4.  Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Gianfranco Damiani; Bruno Federico; Danila Basso; Alessandra Ronconi; Caterina Bianca Neve Aurora Bianchi; Gian Marco Anzellotti; Gabriella Nasi; Franco Sassi; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Diverging trends in educational inequalities in cancer mortality between men and women in the 2000s in France.

Authors:  Gwenn Menvielle; Grégoire Rey; Eric Jougla; Danièle Luce
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Women's participation in breast cancer screening in France--an ethical approach.

Authors:  Grégoire Moutel; Nathalie Duchange; Sylviane Darquy; Sandrine de Montgolfier; Frédérique Papin-Lefebvre; Odile Jullian; Jérôme Viguier; Hélène Sancho-Garnier
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Patterns and determinants of mammography screening in Lebanese women.

Authors:  Nadia Elias; Ibrahim R Bou-Orm; Salim M Adib
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-12-23

8.  Does mammogram attendance influence participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening? A prospective study among 1856 French women.

Authors:  Aurélie Bertaut; Julien Coudert; Leila Bengrine; Vincent Dancourt; Christine Binquet; Serge Douvier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Wealth stratified inequalities in service utilisation of breast cancer screening across the geographical regions: a pooled decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Rashidul Alam Mahumud; Khorshed Alam; Syed Afroz Keramat; Andre M N Renzaho; Md Golam Hossain; Rezwanul Haque; Gail M Ormsby; Jeff Dunn; Jeff Gow
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-06-10

10.  Are immigrants and nationals born to immigrants at higher risk for delayed or no lifetime breast and cervical cancer screening? The results from a population-based survey in Paris metropolitan area in 2010.

Authors:  Claire Rondet; Annabelle Lapostolle; Marion Soler; Francesca Grillo; Isabelle Parizot; Pierre Chauvin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.