Literature DB >> 18414179

Patient gender affects skin cancer screening practices and attitudes among veterans.

Daniel G Federman1, Jeffrey D Kravetz, Fancgchao Ma, Robert S Kirsner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer screening (SCS) with a full body skin examination (FBSE) has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. Little is known about gender differences with respect to SCS practices and attitudes between men and women.
METHODS: Data from two previously published studies based on questionnaires administered to veterans were combined and analyzed according to patient gender. The participants consisted of a convenience sample of 437 patients awaiting primary care, women's health, or dermatology clinic appointments at the West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
RESULTS: Male veterans were more likely to report undergoing FBSE than female veterans (32 versus 18%), but less likely to perform self-examination (42 versus 48%). Female veterans were more likely to report embarrassment than men, but both genders expressed that providers who perform SCS are thorough. Gender discordance between patient and examining physician is more likely to lead to refusal for women than men (16 versus 2%).
CONCLUSION: We found low rates of SCS in both male and female veterans in different clinic settings at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Female veterans are less likely to report undergoing FBSE and more likely than male veterans to perform self-examination for skin cancer, to report embarrassment with FBSE, and refuse FBSE if the examining physician is of the opposite gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18414179     DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318167b739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  5 in total

1.  Overweight and obese patients do not seem to adequately recognize their own risk for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fernanda Leite-Pereira; Rui Medeiros; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Correspondence and correlates of couples' skin cancer screening.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Susan Darlow; Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Teja Munshi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies evaluating provider, patient, and health care system-related barriers to diagnostic skin cancer examinations.

Authors:  Maleka Najmi; Ashley E Brown; Sarah R Harrington; David Farris; Sarah Sepulveda; Kelly C Nelson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 4.  An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Research Literature (2008-2015).

Authors:  Elisheva R Danan; Erin E Krebs; Kristine Ensrud; Eva Koeller; Roderick MacDonald; Tina Velasquez; Nancy Greer; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Incidence and mortality rates of keratinocyte carcinoma from 1998-2017: a population-based study of sex differences in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Evan Tang; Kinwah Fung; An-Wen Chan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 8.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.