Literature DB >> 18413679

High tibial osteotomy for unloading osteochondral defects in the medial compartment of the knee.

Curtis Mina1, William E Garrett, Ricardo Pietrobon, Richard Glisson, Laurence Higgins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy is a well-established method for the treatment of symptomatic medial unicompartmental cartilage degeneration. While the findings of several outcome studies have led to the widely practiced postoperative goal alignment of 8 degrees to 10 degrees of valgus, there exists no literature to account for patient-specific measurements such as body weight, baseline geometry, and medial chondral defect size. Furthermore, there is a lack of literature to support the ideal goal alignment when using high tibial osteotomy to unload isolated chondral defects.
PURPOSE: To identify a relationship between these patient-specific factors and the ideal postoperative alignment. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: High tibial osteotomy was performed on 8 human cadaveric knees and was fixed with a dynamic external fixator. The fixator was used to vary the tibiofemoral alignment from 12 degrees valgus to 10 degrees varus. At each alignment, force, contact area, and pressure distribution were recorded. This pattern was repeated for a range of applied loads (0.8-1.8 x ideal body weight) and across a range of medial chondral defect sizes (10-20 cm).
RESULTS: As tibiofemoral alignment was shifted from varus to valgus alignment, we found a decrease in medial contact pressure (P < .001) and a decrease in medial contact area (P < .001). For all defect sizes, all contact pressure within the medial compartment was shifted to the lateral compartment at between 6 degrees and 10 degrees of valgus. Contact pressure was found to concentrate around the defect rims for all defect sizes.
CONCLUSION: We show that regardless of condylar width, baseline tibiofemoral alignment, body weight, or chondral defect size, all specimens demonstrated complete unloading of the medial compartment at between 6 degrees and 10 degrees of valgus, which favors cartilage repair at these alignments. In addition, regarding the use of high tibial osteotomy for unloading isolated chondral defects, we find that contact pressure is approximately equally distributed between the medial and lateral compartments for alignments of 0 degrees to 4 degrees of valgus. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This loading situation most closely approximates physiologic loading and therefore represents an ideal outcome for patients with isolated chondral defects. Reduction in stress concentration around chondral defects has been found to favor cartilage repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18413679     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508315471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  35 in total

1.  Can young and active patients participate in sports after osteochondral autologous transfer combined with valgus high tibial osteotomy?

Authors:  Philipp Minzlaff; Matthias J Feucht; Tim Saier; Matthias Cotic; Johannes E Plath; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Hinterwimmer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The effect of distal tibial rotation during high tibial osteotomy on the contact pressures in the knee and ankle joints.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Nael Hawi; Ralf Westphal; Yaman Sabbagh; Musa Citak; Friedrich M Wahl; Christian Krettek; Emmanouil Liodakis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Difference in joint line convergence angle between the supine and standing positions is the most important predictive factor of coronal correction error after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon So; Sung-Sahn Lee; Eui Yub Jung; Joo Hwan Kim; Joon Ho Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Preoperative latent medial laxity and correction angle are crucial factors for overcorrection in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Do Kyung Lee; Joon Ho Wang; Yougun Won; Young Ki Min; Sagar Jaiswal; Byung Hoon Lee; Jong-Yeup Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Guidelines for the treatment of unicompartmental cartilage defects of the knee-Cartilage repair, osteotomy, mini-implant or arthroplasty?]

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Andreas Imhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Degree of axis correction in valgus high tibial osteotomy: proposal of an individualised approach.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Philipp Minzlaff; Tim Saier; Matthias Cotic; Norbert P Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Hinterwimmer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Current Concept.

Authors:  Soheil Sabzevari; Adel Ebrahimpour; Mostafa Khalilipour Roudi; Amir R Kachooei
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-06

8.  Association of Meniscal Status, Lower Extremity Alignment, and Body Mass Index With Chondrosis at Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Amanda K Haas; Laura J Huston; Samuel K Nwosu; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The effects of defect size, orientation, and location on subchondral bone contact in oval-shaped experimental articular cartilage defects in a bovine knee model.

Authors:  David C Flanigan; Joshua D Harris; Peter M Brockmeier; Rebecca L Lathrop; Robert A Siston
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Experimental validation of a tibiofemoral model for analyzing joint force distribution.

Authors:  Emily J Miller; Rose F Riemer; Tammy L Haut Donahue; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.