BACKGROUND: With the widespread use of cardiac multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), the issue of incidental findings is receiving increasing attention. Our objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of incidental findings discovered during cardiac MDCT scanning and to identify clinical variables associated with incidental findings. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis involved a population-based sample recruited from an integrated health care delivery system in Northern California as part of the Atherosclerotic Disease, Vascular Function and Genetic Epidemiology (ADVANCE) Study. Healthy men and women aged 60 to 69 years without diagnosed cardiovascular disease underwent cardiac MDCT for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification. The images were prospectively evaluated for incidental findings. RESULTS: A total of 459 participants underwent MDCT scanning, and the overall prevalence of any incidental finding was 41%. Of the 459 participants, 105 (23%) had at least 1 incidental finding that was recommended for clinical or radiological follow-up examination, the most common of which was single or multiple pulmonary nodules (18%). Participants with and without incidental findings had comparable baseline demographics and selected clinical variables, although there were significantly fewer men and a significantly lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in those with incidental findings. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings, especially pulmonary nodules, are common in cardiac MDCT performed to assess coronary artery calcification in older healthy adults. The net risks and benefits of looking for noncardiac abnormalities during cardiac MDCT should be rigorously evaluated.
BACKGROUND: With the widespread use of cardiac multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), the issue of incidental findings is receiving increasing attention. Our objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of incidental findings discovered during cardiac MDCT scanning and to identify clinical variables associated with incidental findings. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis involved a population-based sample recruited from an integrated health care delivery system in Northern California as part of the Atherosclerotic Disease, Vascular Function and Genetic Epidemiology (ADVANCE) Study. Healthy men and women aged 60 to 69 years without diagnosed cardiovascular disease underwent cardiac MDCT for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification. The images were prospectively evaluated for incidental findings. RESULTS: A total of 459 participants underwent MDCT scanning, and the overall prevalence of any incidental finding was 41%. Of the 459 participants, 105 (23%) had at least 1 incidental finding that was recommended for clinical or radiological follow-up examination, the most common of which was single or multiple pulmonary nodules (18%). Participants with and without incidental findings had comparable baseline demographics and selected clinical variables, although there were significantly fewer men and a significantly lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in those with incidental findings. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings, especially pulmonary nodules, are common in cardiac MDCT performed to assess coronary artery calcification in older healthy adults. The net risks and benefits of looking for noncardiac abnormalities during cardiac MDCT should be rigorously evaluated.
Authors: Nicholas M Orme; Joel G Fletcher; Hassan A Siddiki; W Scott Harmsen; Megan M O'Byrne; John D Port; William J Tremaine; Henry C Pitot; Elizabeth G McFarland; Marguerite E Robinson; Barbara A Koenig; Bernard F King; Susan M Wolf Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-09-27
Authors: Alistair C Lindsay; Mona Sriharan; Olga Lazoura; Arunashis Sau; Michael Roughton; Richard J Jabbour; Carlo Di Mario; Simon W Davies; Neil E Moat; Simon P G Padley; Michael B Rubens; Edward D Nicol Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Christoph I Lee; Emily B Tsai; Bronislava M Sigal; Sylvia K Plevritis; Alan M Garber; Geoffrey D Rubin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Elizabeth C Oelsner; Eric A Hoffman; Aaron R Folsom; J Jeffrey Carr; Paul L Enright; Steven M Kawut; Richard Kronmal; David Lederer; Joao A C Lima; Gina S Lovasi; Steven Shea; R Graham Barr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Zainab Samad; Abdul Hakeem; Syed Shad Mahmood; Karen Pieper; Manesh R Patel; David L Simel; Pamela S Douglas Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alex A Balekian; Gerard A Silvestri; Suzanne M Simkovich; Peter J Mestaz; Gillian D Sanders; Jamie Daniel; Jackie Porcel; Michael K Gould Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2013-12
Authors: Elizabeth C Oelsner; J Jeffrey Carr; Paul L Enright; Eric A Hoffman; Aaron R Folsom; Steven M Kawut; Richard A Kronmal; David J Lederer; Joao A C Lima; Gina S Lovasi; Benjamin M Smith; Steven J Shea; R Graham Barr Journal: Thorax Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 9.139