Literature DB >> 18413517

Preverbal photoscreening for amblyogenic factors and outcomes in amblyopia treatment: early objective screening and visual acuities.

Valerie G Kirk1, Michelle M Clausen, M Diane Armitage, Robert W Arnold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that infant photoscreening yields better results than visual acuity screening in preschool-aged children. With conventional vision screening, the patient must be able to provide monocular visual acuity cooperation, whereas objective screening for amblyogenic factors can be done at much younger ages.
METHODS: From February 1996 through February 2006, Alaska Blind Child Discovery photoscreened 21,367 rural and urban Alaskan children through grade 2, with an 82% positive predictive value (ie, true number of those referred); 6.9% were referred for a complete eye examination and treatment. All "referred" interpreted images for children younger than 48 months who were then followed up and treated for more than 2 years were reviewed to determine whether treatment was successful.
RESULTS: Of 411 "positive" screening photos from children younger than 4 years, 94 patients had more than 2 years follow-up. The 36 children photoscreened before age 2 years had a mean treated visual acuity of 0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), which was significantly better than that of 58 children screened between ages 25 and 48 months (mean, 0.26 logMAR). Despite similar levels of amblyogenic risk factors, the proportion of children failing to reach a visual acuity of 20/40 was significantly less among those screened before age 2 years (5%) than in those screened from ages older than 2.0 years and younger than 4.0 years (17%).
CONCLUSION: Very early photoscreening yields better visual outcomes in amblyopia treatment compared with later photoscreening in preschool-aged children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18413517     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.126.4.489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of photorefraction, autorefractometry and retinoscopy in children.

Authors:  Goktug Demirci; Banu Arslan; Mustafa Özsütçü; Mustafa Eliaçık; Gokhan Gulkilik
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Performance of the Spot Vision Screener in Children Younger Than 3 Years of Age.

Authors:  Blake D Forcina; M Millicent Peterseim; M Edward Wilson; Edward W Cheeseman; Samuel Feldman; Amanda L Marzolf; Bethany J Wolf; Rupal H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Tammy Yanovitch; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman; Laura B Enyedi; Priya Kishnani; Gordon Worley; Blythe Crissman; Erica Burner; Terri L Young
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Comparative AAPOS Validation of the blinq. Birefringent Amblyopia Screener with Isolated Small-Angle Strabismus [Response to Letter].

Authors:  Robert W Arnold
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-23

5.  Preschool vision screening in primary care pediatric practice.

Authors:  Robert W Hered; David L Wood
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Refractive error of Saudi children enrolled in primary school and kindergarten measured with a spot screener.

Authors:  Ziaul Haq Yasir; Nada Almadhi; Salma Tarabzouni; Abdulrahman Alhommadi; Rajiv Khandekar
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 May-Aug

7.  Agreement and diagnostic accuracy of vision screening in preschool children between vision technicians and spot vision screener.

Authors:  Neha Misra; Rohit C Khanna; Asha Latha Mettla; Srinivas Marmamula; Jill E Keeffe
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 8.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Canon CP-TX1 camera - As a screening tool for amblyogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Syed Aisha Raza; Abadan Khan Amitava; Yogesh Gupta; Kamran Afzal; Farnaz Kauser; Juhi Saxena; Anam Masood; Aparna Bose; Ramprakash Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.969

10.  Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases.

Authors:  Samuel Joseph Martin; Hser Eh Htoo; Nay Hser; Robert W Arnold
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.