Literature DB >> 18412358

Quantification of zearalenone in various solid agroenvironmental samples using D6-zearalenone as the internal standard.

Niccolo Hartmann1, Marianne Erbs, Felix E Wettstein, Corinne C Hoerger, René P Schwarzenbach, Thomas D Bucheli.   

Abstract

Because of its pronounced estrogenicity, zearalenone may be of concern not only in the aqueous but also in the terrestrial environment. Therefore, we developed several analytical methods to quantify zearalenone in different solid matrices of agroenvironmental relevance (i.e., plant organs, soil, manure, and sewage sludge). The use of D(6)-zearalenone as the internal standard (IS) was essential to render the analytical method largely matrix-independent because it compensated for target analyte losses during extract treatment and ion suppression during ionization. Soil and sewage sludge samples were extracted with Soxhlet, whereas plant material and manure samples were extracted by liquid solvent extraction at room temperature. Absolute recoveries for zearalenone were 70-104% for plant materials, 105% for soil, 76% for manure, and 30% for sewage sludge. Relative recoveries ranged from 86 to 113% for all matrices, indicating that the IS was capable to largely compensate for losses during analysis. Ion suppression, between 8 and 74%, was in all cases compensated by the IS but influenced the method quantification levels. These were 3.2-26.2 ng/g(dryweightdw) for plant materials, 0.7 ng/g(dw) for soil, 12.3 ng/g(dw) for manure, and 6.8 ng/g(dw) for sewage sludge. Plant material concentrations varied from 86 ng/g(dw) to more than 16.7 microg/g(dw), depending on the organ and crop. Soil concentrations were between not detectable and 7.5 ng/g(dw), depending on the sampling depth. Zearalenone could be quantified in all manure samples in concentrations between 8 and 333 ng/g(dw). Except for two of the 85 investigated sewage sludge samples, zearalenone concentrations were below quantification limit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18412358     DOI: 10.1021/jf8002448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  4 in total

1.  Fusarium Mycotoxins in Maize Field Soils: Method Validation and Implications for Sampling Strategy.

Authors:  Kilian G J Kenngott; Julius Albert; Friederike Meyer-Wolfarth; Gabriele E Schaumann; Katherine Muñoz
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.546

2.  Development, validation and application of a multi-mycotoxin method for the analysis of whole wheat plants.

Authors:  Judith Schenzel; Hans-Rudolf Forrer; Susanne Vogelgsang; Thomas D Bucheli
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.833

Review 3.  An overview of conventional and emerging analytical methods for the determination of mycotoxins.

Authors:  Irena Kralj Cigić; Helena Prosen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Development of a LC-MS/MS Method for the Simultaneous Determination of the Mycotoxins Deoxynivalenol (DON) and Zearalenone (ZEA) in Soil Matrix.

Authors:  Arne Kappenberg; Lena Marie Juraschek
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.