S Tsujimura1, K Saito, S Nakayamada, Y Tanaka. 1. First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahata-nishi, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Interstitial pneumonia (IP) associated with CTDs often progresses despite conventional immunosuppressive treatment. We investigated the efficacy of human urinary trypsin (UT) inhibitor (ulinastatin) on refractory IP. METHODS: Five patients with IP received UT inhibitor (3 x 10(5) U) infusion into the internal jugular vein, three times in a single day. The response to this therapy was assessed clinically and by chest CT, PaO(2) and serum KL-6. The kinetics of UT inhibitor was determined in arterial blood. We measured serum levels of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and TGF-beta1, which are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of IP. RESULTS: Serum concentrations of UT inhibitor increased immediately to >150 U/ml after infusion of 3 x 10(5) U of UT inhibitor. The treatment resulted in clinical and radiological improvements in four patients, and allowed reduction of oxygen therapy following improvement of hypoxaemia within 1 month. UT inhibitor decreased serum levels of KL-6 in all patients and had no adverse effects. MCP-1 and TGF-beta1 concentrations were higher in the patients than in normal subjects, and infusion of 3 x 10(5) U of UT reduced the concentrations within 3 h of infusion. CONCLUSION: UT inhibitor bolus infusion therapy is a potentially useful therapeutic strategy for intractable IP based on the different mechanism of action relative to conventional immunosuppressive therapy and lack of serious treatment-related adverse effects.
OBJECTIVE:Interstitial pneumonia (IP) associated with CTDs often progresses despite conventional immunosuppressive treatment. We investigated the efficacy of human urinary trypsin (UT) inhibitor (ulinastatin) on refractory IP. METHODS: Five patients with IP received UT inhibitor (3 x 10(5) U) infusion into the internal jugular vein, three times in a single day. The response to this therapy was assessed clinically and by chest CT, PaO(2) and serum KL-6. The kinetics of UT inhibitor was determined in arterial blood. We measured serum levels of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and TGF-beta1, which are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of IP. RESULTS: Serum concentrations of UT inhibitor increased immediately to >150 U/ml after infusion of 3 x 10(5) U of UT inhibitor. The treatment resulted in clinical and radiological improvements in four patients, and allowed reduction of oxygen therapy following improvement of hypoxaemia within 1 month. UT inhibitor decreased serum levels of KL-6 in all patients and had no adverse effects. MCP-1 and TGF-beta1 concentrations were higher in the patients than in normal subjects, and infusion of 3 x 10(5) U of UT reduced the concentrations within 3 h of infusion. CONCLUSION: UT inhibitor bolus infusion therapy is a potentially useful therapeutic strategy for intractable IP based on the different mechanism of action relative to conventional immunosuppressive therapy and lack of serious treatment-related adverse effects.