| Literature DB >> 18411058 |
Abstract
Simulationists have recently started to employ the term "empathy" when characterizing our most basic understanding of other minds. I agree that empathy is crucial, but I think it is being misconstrued by the simulationists. Using some ideas to be found in Scheler's classical discussion of empathy, I will argue for a different understanding of the notion. More specifically, I will argue that there are basic levels of interpersonal understanding-in particular the understanding of emotional expressions-that are not explicable in terms of simulation-plus-projection routines.Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18411058 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conscious Cogn ISSN: 1053-8100