Literature DB >> 18410801

Broad-spectrum sunscreens provide better protection from solar ultraviolet-simulated radiation and natural sunlight-induced immunosuppression in human beings.

Dominique D Moyal1, Anny M Fourtanier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is well established that ultraviolet (UV) radiation induces immunomodulatory effects that may be involved in skin cancer. Recent studies have shown that UVA (320-400 nm) and UVB (290-320 nm) radiation are immunosuppressive. As a result, sunscreens, which mainly absorb UVB, may be less effective in preventing UV radiation-induced immunosuppression than broad-spectrum products.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the effects of UVA exposure on human delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response and compare the efficacy of sunscreens having different levels of sun-protection factor (SPF) and UVA protection against both solar-simulated radiation and outdoor real-life sunlight exposure conditions.
METHODS: DTH was assessed using a kit which includes 7 recall antigens that most of the participants encountered during childhood immunization. Evaluation of DTH test response was made 48 hours after test application before and after UV exposure with or without sunscreens.
RESULTS: In unprotected participants, the response to DTH tests was significantly reduced irrespective of UV types of exposure (full-spectrum UVA, long UVA, solar-simulated radiation). A UVB sunscreen failed to protect from solar-simulated radiation-induced immunosuppression. In contrast, a broad-spectrum sunscreen with the same SPF but providing a high protection in the UVA range significantly reduced local UV-induced immunosuppression and prevented the distant effects. In the outdoor study, as compared with DTH responses obtained before sun exposure, no alteration of immune response was detected when the skin was protected by a broad-spectrum sunscreen having a high protection level in the UVA (SPF 25, UVA protection factor 14). Conversely a broad-spectrum sunscreen with lower protection against UVA (SPF 25, UVA protection factor 6) failed to prevent UV-impaired response. LIMITATIONS: These results have been obtained after repeated exposure. Additional experiments obtained under acute exposure are in progress.
CONCLUSION: These findings clearly demonstrated the role of UVA in the induction of photoimmunosuppression together with the need for sunscreen products providing efficient photoprotection throughout the entire UV spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18410801     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  17 in total

1.  Nonsurgical innovations in the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Authors:  Sadegh Amini; Martha H Viera; Whitney Valins; Brian Berman
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-06

2.  Natural Substances for Prevention of Skin Photoaging: Screening Systems in the Development of Sunscreen and Rejuvenation Cosmetics.

Authors:  Vladimir Kostyuk; Alla Potapovich; Ahmed R Albuhaydar; Wolfgang Mayer; Chiara De Luca; Liudmila Korkina
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.663

Review 3.  Noninvasive Facial Rejuvenation. Part 1: Patient-Directed.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Commander; Daniel Chang; Abdulla Fakhro; Marjory G Nigro; Edward I Lee
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  [Prevention of occupational solar UV radiation-induced epithelial skin cancer].

Authors:  A Bauer; S Beissert; P Knuschke
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Emerging need for novel biomarkers.

Authors:  Atte Kivisaari; Veli-Matti Kähäri
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-10

6.  Possible implication of local immune response in Darier's disease: an immunohistochemical characterization of lesional inflammatory infiltrate.

Authors:  Clelia Miracco; Francesco Pietronudo; Vasileios Mourmouras; Michele Pellegrino; Monica Onorati; Maria Grazia Mastrogiulio; Luca Cantarini; Pietro Luzi
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 7.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating actinic keratosis.

Authors:  Marjorie V Neidecker; Mary Lynn Davis-Ajami; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  A pendant peptide endows a sunscreen with water-resistance.

Authors:  Aubrey J Ellison; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  A retrospective analysis of dermatological lesions in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Michela Castello; Marilena Gregorini; Teresa Rampino; Francesca Bosio; Giulia Bedino; Giovanni Piotti; Grazia Soccio; Pasquale Esposito; Catherine Klersy; Massimo Abelli; Giovanni Borroni; Antonio Dal Canton
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Preparation, Characterization and Evaluation of Organogel-Based Lipstick Formulations: Application in Cosmetics.

Authors:  Cloé L Esposito; Plamen Kirilov
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2021-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.