Literature DB >> 18409095

Effects of different feed additives alone or in combination on broiler performance, gut microflora and ileal histology.

B Owens1, L Tucker, M A Collins, K J McCracken.   

Abstract

1. The objectives of this experiment were to investigate the effects of different xylanases, alone or in combination with different organic acid and oligosaccharide sources, on bird performance, gut microflora and ileal histology. 2. Birds were given a diet based on a commercial formulation, which was split into 8 batches. Batch 1 contained the antibiotic growth promoter Avilamycin and acted as the positive control. To batch 2 the enzyme Allzyme PT was added and to batch 3 Allzyme PT was added with the organic acid and oligosaccharide mixture Avimos. To batch 4, Allzyme PT was added with the oligosaccharide mixture Biomos. To batch 5, yeast extract 2012 was added with the organic acid mixture Gustor and the enzyme xylanase XP20. To batch 6, yeast extract 2012 and feed acidifier Gustor were added as before, with the enzyme Avizyme 1300. Batches 7 and 8 both acted as negative experimental controls, with no added growth promoters. 3. A total of 64 birds were housed in individual wire cages in each of three consecutive experimental replicates (24 birds/treatment). Birds were fed ad libitum from 7 to 28 d and a 7-d excreta collection was carried out to determine apparent metabolisable energy (AME) content. 4. At 28 d, the birds were killed and viscosity of jejunal digesta supernatant and gizzard weight were determined. Samples were taken from the crop, ileum and caecum and analysed for viable presumptive lactic acid bacteria and coliforms. The overall microbial flora was determined using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S ribosomal DNA followed by DNA sequence analysis in order to assign amplicons to a bacterial species. Ileal sections were also collected for histological analysis. 5. Total live weight gain (12%) and gain:feed (9%) were significantly improved for all diets containing additives, compared to the negative control diets. All diets containing xylanases gave significantly lower in vivo viscosity values than the positive and negative controls. Diet treatment significantly affected viable coliform numbers in the ileum and also viable lactobacilli in the ileum and caecum. A substantial proportion of the bacteria present in the GI tract (40%) belong to unknown species. No effects of diet treatment on histological measurements were observed in this study. 6. All the additive combinations studied were at least as effective as the antibiotic growth promoter and the results for Allzyme PT suggest that xylanase alone is as effective as any of the combinations studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18409095     DOI: 10.1080/00071660802004890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  10 in total

1.  Influence of antimicrobial feed additives on broiler commensal posthatch gut microbiota development and performance.

Authors:  Valeria A Torok; Gwen E Allison; Nigel J Percy; Kathy Ophel-Keller; Robert J Hughes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet.

Authors:  Deng Pan; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2013-10-31

3.  Kinetic and thermodynamic study of cloned thermostable endo-1,4-β-xylanase from Thermotoga petrophila in mesophilic host.

Authors:  Ikram ul Haq; Zahid Hussain; Mahmood Ali Khan; Bushra Muneer; Sumra Afzal; Sana Majeed; Fatima Akram
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Microbiota and Transcriptomic Effects of an Essential Oil Blend and Its Delivery Route Compared to an Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Samson Oladokun; K Fraser Clark; Deborah I Adewole
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-21

5.  Effect of dietary supplementation of organic acids on performance, intestinal histomorphology, and serum biochemistry of broiler chicken.

Authors:  Sheikh Adil; Tufail Banday; Gulam Ahmad Bhat; Masood Saleem Mir; Manzoor Rehman
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2010-06-14

6.  Modulations of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment.

Authors:  Jessica L Danzeisen; Hyeun Bum Kim; Richard E Isaacson; Zheng Jin Tu; Timothy J Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Host and Environmental Factors Affecting the Intestinal Microbiota in Chickens.

Authors:  Jannigje G Kers; Francisca C Velkers; Egil A J Fischer; Gerben D A Hermes; J A Stegeman; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Patterns of community assembly in the developing chicken microbiome reveal rapid primary succession.

Authors:  Stephanie D Jurburg; Michael S M Brouwer; Daniela Ceccarelli; Jeanet van der Goot; Alfons J M Jansman; Alex Bossers
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Comparison of Different Invasive and Non-Invasive Methods to Characterize Intestinal Microbiota throughout a Production Cycle of Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Jannigje G Kers; Egil A J Fischer; J Arjan Stegeman; Hauke Smidt; Francisca C Velkers
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-10-10

10.  Effects of replacing dietary Aureomycin with a combination of plant essential oils on production performance and gastrointestinal health of broilers.

Authors:  Fuguang Xue; Lei Shi; Yunlei Li; Aixin Ni; Hui Ma; Yanyan Sun; Jilan Chen
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.