Literature DB >> 18408580

Benefit of Neoral C2 monitoring in de novo cardiac transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction.

Marcelo Cantarovich1, Heather Ross, José M Arizón, Miguel A Gómez, Lynn Straatman, Josefina Orús, Luis Alonso-Pulpón, Beatriz Díaz Molina, Shaohua Wang, Ernesto Lage, María G Crespo, Nicolás Manito, Jonathan Howlett, Haissam Haddad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For cyclosporine (CsA), 2-hr postdose level (C2) is the best single time point predictor of the area under the curve and a critical measure for effective dosing. The therapeutic CsA microemulsion (Neoral) C2 range in de novo heart transplant patients remains to be determined.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of CsA C2 monitoring in de novo heart transplant patients receiving basiliximab induction.
METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized study enrolled 87 adult heart transplant recipients stratified according to 4 to 6 hrs posttransplant serum creatinine less than or equal to 170 micromol/L (cohort A) or more than 170 micromol/L (cohort B). Patients in cohort A were randomized into three C2 ranges (A1: "high" n=25, 1600-1800 ng/mL; A2: "intermediate" n=27, 1400-1600 ng/mL; and A3: "low" n=24, 1200-1400 ng/mL). Patients in cohort B were randomized into intermediate (n=5) and low C2 (n=6). Target ranges were progressively lowered after 1 month. Immunosuppression included basiliximab, Neoral, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Endpoints were acute rejection and renal function.
RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection at 12 months was 44% in group A1, 41% in group A2, 33% in group A3, and 27% in cohort B. Pretransplant and 12-month creatinine clearance (mL/min) were group A1, 72+/-25 and 64+/-24; group A2, 81+/-32 and 68+/-25; group A3, 91+/-28 and 86+/-26; and cohort B, 62+/-28 and 79+/-37.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that C2 monitoring is safe in de novo heart transplant patients. A low Neoral C2 range in combination with basiliximab induction resulted in preserved renal function without increased risk of acute rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18408580     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318169bf43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Impact of the reduction of calcineurin inhibitors on renal function in heart transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Catherine Cornu; Christophe Dufays; Ségolène Gaillard; François Gueyffier; Michel Redonnet; Laurent Sebbag; Ana Roussoulières; Christian A Gleissner; Jan Groetzner; Hans B Lehmkuhl; Luciano Potena; Lars Gullestad; Marcelo Cantarovich; Pascale Boissonnat
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  The impact of everolimus versus mycophenolate on blood and lymphocyte cyclosporine exposure in heart-transplant recipients.

Authors:  Finn Gustafsson; David Barth; Diego H Delgado; Meerna Nsouli; Jill Sheedy; Heather J Ross
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Thymoglobulin induction in heart transplantation: patient selection and implications for maintenance immunosuppression.

Authors:  Andreas Zuckermann; Uwe Schulz; Tobias Deuse; Arjang Ruhpawar; Jan D Schmitto; Andres Beiras-Fernandez; Stephan Hirt; Martin Schweiger; Laurenz Kopp-Fernandes; Markus J Barten
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.782

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.