Literature DB >> 18408401

Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in Mumbai, India. 1. Compliance to screening.

Ketayun Dinshaw1, Gauravi Mishra, Surendra Shastri, Rajendra Badwe, Rajendra Kerkar, Subhash Ramani, Meenakshi Thakur, Pallavi Uplap, Anagha Kakade, Subhadra Gupta, Balasubramanian Ganesh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of screening by low-cost technology in down-staging and reducing mortality due to breast and cervix cancer.
METHODS: The present trial is a community-based, cluster randomised controlled cohort study on screening for breast and cervix cancers (clinical breast examination and visual inspection of the cervix after application of 4% acetic acid). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses are conducted to identify the predictors of participation in screening.
RESULTS: The average compliance is 71.43 and 64.93% for breast and cervix cancer screening, respectively, with the highest compliance in round 1. At the end of 3 screening rounds, 94 and 84% of the eligible women were screened at least once for breast and cervix cancer, respectively. Younger women, women from other than Hindu and Muslim communities, school level-educated women, women belonging to lower-income families, Marathi-speaking women, married women and women who had previously consulted for any breast or gynaecological complaints had higher compliance to participation in screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Good compliance rates to screening have been demonstrated in the trial, reflecting acceptance of the study by the society, which has implications while translating the trial into a programme. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18408401     DOI: 10.1159/000126497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  13 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk; Waleed Elnahas; Ashraf Khater; Aiman El-Saed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India.

Authors:  Surendra S Shastri; Indraneel Mittra; Gauravi A Mishra; Subhadra Gupta; Rajesh Dikshit; Shalini Singh; Rajendra A Badwe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Implementing community-based cervical cancer screening programs using visual inspection with acetic acid in India: A systematic review.

Authors:  Prajakta Adsul; Nitin Manjunath; Vijaya Srinivas; Anjali Arun; Purnima Madhivanan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Cancer screening and prevention in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Aditi Shastri; Surendra Srinivas Shastri
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Cluster randomized trials of cancer screening interventions: are appropriate statistical methods being used?

Authors:  Catherine M Crespi; Annette E Maxwell; Sheng Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  The challenges of implementing low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Eduardo Edelman Saul; Raquel B Guerra; Michelle Edelman Saul; Laercio Lopes da Silva; Gabriel F P Aleixo; Raquel M K Matuda; Gilberto Lopes
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-11-30

7.  Safety and immunogenicity profile of human papillomavirus-16/18 AS04 adjuvant cervical cancer vaccine: a randomized controlled trial in healthy adolescent girls of Bangladesh.

Authors:  Sabera Khatun; Syed Md Akram Hussain; Sameena Chowdhury; Jannatul Ferdous; Fawzia Hossain; Sultana Razia Begum; Munira Jahan; Shahina Tabassum; Shahla Khatun; A B M Fazlul Karim
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Systematic review of breast cancer biology in developing countries (part 2): asian subcontinent and South East Asia.

Authors:  Riyaz Bhikoo; Sanket Srinivasa; Tzu-Chieh Yu; David Moss; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Barriers to Cancer Screening Uptake in Women: A Qualitative Study from Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Selvam Mahalakshmi; Sundaram Suresh
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-04-01

10.  Determinants of Compliance to Population-Based Oral Cancer Screening Program among low Socioeconomic Women in Mumbai, India.

Authors:  Gauravi A Mishra; Heenakauser A Shaikh; Sharmila A Pimple; Aanchal A Awasthi; Vasundhara Y Kulkarni
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2021-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.