Literature DB >> 18407570

Spatial clustering of the failure to geocode and its implications for the detection of disease clustering.

Dale L Zimmerman1, Xiangming Fang, Soumya Mazumdar.   

Abstract

Geocoding a study population as completely as possible is an important data assimilation component of many spatial epidemiologic studies. Unfortunately, complete geocoding is rare in practice. The failure of a substantial proportion of study subjects' addresses to geocode has consequences for spatial analyses, some of which are not yet fully understood. This article explicitly demonstrates that the failure to geocode can be spatially clustered, and it investigates the implications of this for the detection of disease clustering. A data set of more than 9000 ground-truthed addresses from Carroll County, Iowa, which was geocoded via a standard address matching and street interpolation algorithm, is used for this purpose. Through simulation of disease processes at these addresses, the authors show that spatial clustering of geocoding failure has no effect on the marginal power to detect spatial disease clustering if the likelihood of disease is independent of the failure to geocode, but that power is substantially reduced if disease likelihood and geocoding failure are positively associated.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18407570     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

1.  Geostatistical analysis of health data with different levels of spatial aggregation.

Authors:  Pierre Goovaerts
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  A research agenda: does geocoding positional error matter in health GIS studies?

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-14

3.  A multi-stage approach to maximizing geocoding success in a large population-based cohort study through automated and interactive processes.

Authors:  Jennifer S Sonderman; Michael T Mumma; Sarah S Cohen; Elizabeth L Cope; William J Blot; Lisa B Signorello
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.212

4.  Accuracy of commercially available residential histories for epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez; Melissa J Slotnick; Jaymie R Meliker; Gillian AvRuskin; Glenn Copeland; Jerome Nriagu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Using imputation to provide location information for nongeocoded addresses.

Authors:  Frank C Curriero; Martin Kulldorff; Francis P Boscoe; Ann C Klassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Local indicators of geocoding accuracy (LIGA): theory and application.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez; Robert Rommel
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  Geographic variability in geocoding success for West Nile virus cases in South Dakota.

Authors:  Christine L Wey; Jennifer Griesse; Lon Kightlinger; Michael C Wimberly
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 4.078

8.  Spatial clustering of non-transported cardiac decedents: the results of a point pattern analysis and an inquiry into social environmental correlates.

Authors:  Elizabeth Barnett Pathak; Steven Reader; Jean Paul Tanner; Michele L Casper
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.

Authors:  Xiaohui Xu; Hui Hu; Sandie Ha; Daikwon Han
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.212

10.  Inaccuracy, uncertainty and the space-time permutation scan statistic.

Authors:  Nicholas Malizia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.