| Literature DB >> 18407382 |
Hans C Rümke1, José-María Bayas, José-Ramón de Juanes, Covadonga Caso, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Magda Campins, Lars Rombo, Xavier Duval, Viktor Romanenko, Tino F Schwarz, Rustem Fassakhov, Francisco Abad-Santos, Frank von Sonnenburg, Mamadou Dramé, Roland Sänger, W Ripley Ballou.
Abstract
A multicentre, randomized, phase III clinical trial in 5071 healthy adults was conducted to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of a 15 microg HA dose of a candidate oil-in-water emulsion-based adjuvant system (AS)-adjuvanted split-virion H5N1 (AS-H5N1) vaccine compared to a licensed seasonal influenza vaccine, Fluarix.(1) Stringent criteria were used to evaluate adverse events and reactogenicity profile. Overall, 96.7% of the 5071 vaccinated subjects completed the study. Significantly more participants in the AS-H5N1 vaccine group reported general or local adverse events. Pain was the most common symptom in both treatment groups. Less than 1% of subjects withdrew from the study due to adverse events and no withdrawals were due to serious adverse events related to vaccination. The safety and reactogenicity profile of the AS-H5N1 candidate vaccine can be considered clinically acceptable in the context of its use against pandemic influenza.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18407382 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 3.641