Literature DB >> 18406445

Mercury vapor in residential building common areas in communities where mercury is used for cultural purposes versus a reference community.

Gary Garetano1, Alan H Stern, Mark Robson, Michael Gochfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure to elemental mercury (Hg0) in residential buildings can occur from accidental spills, broken objects (thermometers, fluorescent fixtures, thermostats), and deliberate introduction, one mode of which involves cultural practices by individuals who believe dispersal of mercury in a residence will bring luck, enhance health or ward off harm.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether mercury vapor levels in common areas of residential buildings is higher in a community where cultural uses are likely (study areas S1, S2) than in a reference community (C1) where cultural use is unlikely, and whether levels can serve as a signal of significant cultural mercury use.
METHODS: We monitored Hg0 vapor with a portable spectrophotometer in the three communities. We randomly selected sites in S1 and C1 community, and also include sites in S2 specified by local health officials who suspected cultural mercury use. We evaluated 122 multifamily buildings and 116 outdoor locations.
FINDINGS: We found >25 ng/m3 Hg0 in 14% of buildings in study areas compared to only one reference building. In the latter we identified an accidental mercury spill from a bottle that had been brought into the building. Both the mean and maximum indoor mercury vapor levels were greater in the study communities than in the reference community. In all communities, we observed mean indoor Hg0 vapor concentration greater than outdoors, although in two-thirds of buildings, indoor levels did not exceed the area-specific outdoor upper-limit concentration.
CONCLUSION: After controlling for factors that might influence Hg0 vapor levels, the most plausible explanation for greater Hg0 levels in the study area is a relationship to cultural use of mercury. None of the measured levels exceeded the ATSDR minimum risk level for residences of 200 ng/m3 Hg0 although levels in living quarters might be greater than those in the common areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18406445      PMCID: PMC4398391          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  17 in total

1.  Measuring exposure to an elemental mercury spill--Dakota County, Minnesota, 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Chronic low-level mercury exposure, BDNF polymorphism, and associations with cognitive and motor function.

Authors:  Diana Echeverria; James S Woods; Nicholas J Heyer; Dianne S Rohlman; Federico M Farin; Alvah C Bittner; Tingting Li; Claire Garabedian
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.763

3.  Gaseous elemental mercury as an indoor air pollutant.

Authors:  A Carpi; Y F Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Mercury use in espiritismo: a survey of botanicas.

Authors:  L H Zayas; P O Ozuah
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Release of mercury from broken fluorescent bulbs.

Authors:  Michael Aucott; Michael McLinden; Michael Winka
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Mercury in the environment: sources, toxicities, and prevention of exposure.

Authors:  Christine L Johnson
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.132

7.  Mercury vapor concentrations inside buildings.

Authors:  R S Foote
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Mercury exposure in an urban pediatric population.

Authors:  Philip O Ozuah; Michael S Lesser; James S Woods; Hyunok Choi; Morri Markowitz
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

9.  Mercury exposure among residents of a building formerly used for industrial purposes--New Jersey, 1995.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1996-05-24       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Assessing elemental mercury vapor exposure from cultural and religious practices.

Authors:  D M Riley; C A Newby; T O Leal-Almeraz; V M Thomas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Disproportionate exposures in environmental justice and other populations: the importance of outliers.

Authors:  Michael Gochfeld; Joanna Burger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Ecological information needs for environmental justice.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Stuart Harris; Barbara Harper; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Population-based comparison of biomarker concentrations for chemicals of concern among Latino-American and non-Hispanic white children.

Authors:  M E Perla; Tessa Rue; Allen Cheadle; James Krieger; Catherine J Karr; C K Karr
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.