Literature DB >> 18405866

Implications of accuracy, sensitivity, and variability of body size estimations to disordered eating.

Alexander J Mussap1, Marita P McCabe, Lina A Ricciardelli.   

Abstract

The current study was conducted to investigate the relationships between body size estimations and disordered eating symptomatology. The method of constant stimuli was used to derive three measures of self-perceived body size in 93 women: (1) accuracy of body size estimations (body image distortion); (2) sensitivity in discriminating body size within blocks of trials (body image sensitivity); and (3) variability in making body size estimations between blocks of trials (body image variability). Participants also completed measures of disordered eating. Although body image distortion correlated with dietary restraint and eating concern, body image variability accounted for additional variance in these variables, as well as variance in binge eating. The relationships involving body image variability were found to be mediated by body dissatisfaction and internalization of the thin ideal. Together, these results are consistent with the proposition that body image variability is a significant factor in disordered eating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18405866     DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Body Image        ISSN: 1740-1445


  5 in total

1.  Body size overestimation and its association with body mass index, body dissatisfaction, and drive for thinness in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Jennifer Hagman; Rick M Gardner; Dana L Brown; Jane Gralla; Jennifer M Fier; Guido K W Frank
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Impaired processing of self-face recognition in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  France Hirot; Marine Lesage; Lya Pedron; Isabelle Meyer; Pierre Thomas; Olivier Cottencin; Dewi Guardia
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Past visual experiences weigh in on body size estimation.

Authors:  Joanna Alexi; Dominique Cleary; Kendra Dommisse; Romina Palermo; Nadine Kloth; David Burr; Jason Bell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Perceived face size in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The perceived size of the implicit representation of the dorsum and palm of the hand.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.