Literature DB >> 18405319

Environmental health research on hazards in the home and the duty to warn.

David B Resnik1, Darryl C Zeldin.   

Abstract

When environmental health researchers study hazards in the home, they often discover information that may be relevant to protecting the health and safety of the research subjects and occupants. This article describes the ethical and legal basis for a duty to warn research subjects and occupants about hazards in the home and explores the extent of this duty. Investigators should inform research subjects and occupants about the results of tests conducted as part of the research protocol only if the information is likely to be accurate, reliable, and medically useful. Investigators should warn subjects and occupants about hazards they happen to discover while they are in the home, if a reasonable person would warn the subjects and occupants about those hazards. Investigators should not report illegal hazards discovered in the home to the authorities, unless those hazards constitute abuse or neglect of children or mentally disabled people living in the home. When investigators decide to warn research subjects and occupants about hazards in the home, they should take some steps to help them make effective use of this information, such as providing additional counselling or making a referral for remediation or medical treatment. Investigators should discuss these issues with research subjects during the informed consent process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18405319      PMCID: PMC2633866          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00638.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  8 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Ethical and practical considerations in managing incidental findings in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Judy Illes; John E Desmond; Lynn F Huang; Thomas A Raffin; Scott W Atlas
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Research on environmental health interventions: ethical problems and solutions.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Darryl C Zeldin; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  The clinical investigator as fiduciary: discarding a misguided idea.

Authors:  E Haavi Morreim
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Mandatory reporting of domestic violence: the law, friend or foe?

Authors:  Laura G Iavicoli
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2005-07

6.  Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Protecting third parties in human subjects research.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

8.  Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma.

Authors:  Wayne J Morgan; Ellen F Crain; Rebecca S Gruchalla; George T O'Connor; Meyer Kattan; Richard Evans; James Stout; George Malindzak; Ernestine Smartt; Marshall Plaut; Michelle Walter; Benjamin Vaughn; Herman Mitchell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in Environmental Health Research.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Ethics Biol Eng Med       Date:  2010

2.  Environmental Health Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethical Issues.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2008-07-14

3.  Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Stephanie R Morain; Kevin Weinfurt; Juli Bollinger; Gail Geller; Debra Jh Mathews; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 4.  The Legal Implications of Report Back in Household Exposure Studies.

Authors:  Shaun A Goho
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.464

6.  Environmental health research and the observer's dilemma.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.