Literature DB >> 18404673

A comparison of the aldosterone-blocking agents eplerenone and spironolactone.

Allan Struthers1, Henry Krum, Gordon H Williams.   

Abstract

Improved understanding of the adverse pharmacological properties of aldosterone has prompted investigation of the clinical benefits of blocking aldosterone at the receptor level. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of the two available blocking agents, spironolactone and eplerenone. A Medline search identified clinical studies assessing spironolactone and eplerenone. Priority was given to large, well-controlled, clinical trials and comparative studies. Pharmacological differences between spironolactone and eplerenone include lower affinity of eplerenone for progesterone, androgen, and glucocorticoid receptors; more consistently demonstrated nongenomic properties for eplerenone; and the presence of long-acting metabolites for spironolactone. Both agents effectively treat hypertension and heart failure but comparisons are complicated by the deficiency of head-to-head trials and differences between patient populations. There are differences in the tolerability profiles; spironolactone is associated with dose-dependent sexual side effects. Both agents produce dose-dependent increases in potassium concentrations, although the effect with spironolactone appears to be greater when both agents are administered at recommended doses. Choice of a specific agent should be based on individual patient issues, such as the nature of heart failure and patient concerns about adverse events. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404673      PMCID: PMC6652937          DOI: 10.1002/clc.20324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  58 in total

Review 1.  Novel therapeutic targets for hypertension.

Authors:  Ludovit Paulis; Thomas Unger
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Eplerenone: a review of its use in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and mild symptoms.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Aldosterone receptor antagonists: effective but often forgotten.

Authors:  Bradley A Maron; Jane A Leopold
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Spironolactone inhibits the growth of cancer stem cells by impairing DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ayala Gold; Lital Eini; Malka Nissim-Rafinia; Ruth Viner; Shlomit Ezer; Keren Erez; Nasma Aqaqe; Rotem Hanania; Michael Milyavsky; Eran Meshorer; Michal Goldberg
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists attenuate exaggerated exercise pressor reflex responses in hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Ryan M Downey; Masaki Mizuno; Jere H Mitchell; Wanpen Vongpatanasin; Scott A Smith
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Comparison of two mineralcorticosteroids receptor antagonists for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Francesco Pichi; Paola Carrai; Antonio Ciardella; Francine Behar-Cohen; Paolo Nucci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Differential efficacy profile of aldosterone receptor antagonists, depending on the type of chronic heart failure, whether with reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction-results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Renato De Vecchis; Carmelina Ariano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 8.  Neprilysin inhibition: A brief review of past pharmacological strategies for heart failure treatment and future directions.

Authors:  Erik H Howell; Scott J Cameron
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 9.  Genomic and rapid effects of aldosterone: what we know and do not know thus far.

Authors:  Milla Marques Hermidorff; Leonardo Vinícius Monteiro de Assis; Mauro César Isoldi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Predicting the relative binding affinity of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists by density functional methods.

Authors:  Katarina Roos; Anders Hogner; Derek Ogg; Martin J Packer; Eva Hansson; Kenneth L Granberg; Emma Evertsson; Anneli Nordqvist
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.