Literature DB >> 18404110

Facet asymmetry in normal vertebral growth: characterization and etiologic theory of scoliosis.

Youssef M Masharawi1, Smadar Peleg, Hanne B Albert, Gali Dar, Nili Steingberg, Bahaa Medlej, Janan Abbas, Khalil Salame, Yigal Mirovski, Nathan Peled, Israel Hershkovitz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The shape and orientation of the thoracic and lumbar zygapophyseal facets at the T1-L5 level in children were measured and analyzed.
OBJECTIVE: To detect the pattern of zygapophyseal facet asymmetry in the thoracic and lumbar spines in children. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Whereas many studies have defined the pattern of zygapophyseal facet asymmetry in adults, there is insufficient data in children.
METHODS: A 3-dimensional digitizer was used to measure zygapophyseal facet size, topography (length, width, concavity, convexity, and lateral interfacet height), and orientation (transverse and sagittal facet angles) at the T1-L5 level. Thirty-two complete, nonpathologic skeletons of children (age range from 4 to 17 years), housed at the Hamman-Todd Human Osteological Collection (Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, OH) were assessed. Statistical analysis included paired t tests and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: In general, zygapophyseal facet asymmetry in children exists only in the superior facets of the thoracic spine and is independent of age: The right superior facet is significantly shorter than the left in all thoracic vertebrae T1-T12 (up to -2.91 mm at T1), and significantly wider than the left in thoracic vertebrae T1-T9 (T8 excluded) (P < 0.003). The right superior transverse and sagittal facet angles are significantly greater than the left in thoracic vertebrae T1-T11, indicating a lesser inclination (in the sagittal plane) and more frontally positioned facet (in the transverse plane) (P < 0.003). Facet asymmetry was not evident in the superior or inferior facets of the lumbar vertebrae.
CONCLUSION: Facet asymmetry in thoracic vertebrae appears in early childhood. The pattern of this asymmetry differs from that reported for adults and may be considered as a possible contributing etiological factor in the development of different types of idiopathic scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404110     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816b1f83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Laterality of cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  Yuichi Takahashi; Takao Yasuhara; Shinji Kumamoto; Kotaro Yoneda; Takashi Tanoue; Masayuki Nakahara; Takafumi Inoue; Yasukazu Hijikata; Tejin Lee; Cesario V Borlongan; Koichi Ogawa; Kenki Nishida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Rib length asymmetry in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is it primary or secondary?

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu; Guangquan Sun; Ze-Zhang Zhu; Wei-Jun Wang; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Mechanism of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at risk for progression; a unifying pathway of development by normal growth and imbalance.

Authors:  Christian Wong
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-01-27

4.  Strengthening borehole configuration from the retaining roadway for greenhouse gas reduction: a case study.

Authors:  Fei Xue; Nong Zhang; Xiaowei Feng; Xigui Zheng; Jiaguang Kan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The innervation of the cervical facet joints-an anatomical and histological approach.

Authors:  Fabian Büsken; Arno Lataster; Andreas Herrler
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.409

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.