Literature DB >> 18403750

Totipotency/pluripotency and patentability.

Hans-Werner Denker.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In their article entitled " COMMENTARY: Is totipotency of a human cell a sufficient reason to exclude its patentability under the European law" (Stem Cells 2007;25:3026-3028), K.T. Vrtovec and B. Vrtovec conclude that arguments based on differentiation potential should not be an obstacle to patenting human embryonic stem cells (and related cells referred to as totipotent or pluripotent). While concentrating on formal legal aspects, however, these authors fail to consider a major biological and ethical argument already found in the literature, namely that an obstacle to patenting is to be seen in the potential of cells (e.g., of embryonic stem cell lines), if this potential allows (re)constitution of an embryo when tetraploid complementation is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18403750     DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  2 in total

Review 1.  Transposon tools: worldwide landscape of intellectual property and technological developments.

Authors:  Fabien Palazzoli; François-Xavier Testu; Franck Merly; Yves Bigot
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Time to reconsider stem cell induction strategies.

Authors:  Hans-Werner Denker
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 6.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.