BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An early and reliable prognosis for recovery in stroke patients is important for initiation of individual treatment and for informing patients and relatives. We recently developed and validated models for predicting survival and functional independence within 3 months after acute stroke, based on age and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score assessed within 6 hours after stroke. Herein we demonstrate the applicability of our models in an independent sample of patients from controlled clinical trials. METHODS: The prognostic models were used to predict survival and functional recovery in 5419 patients from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA). Furthermore, we tried to improve the accuracy by adapting intercepts and estimating new model parameters. RESULTS: The original models were able to correctly classify 70.4% (survival) and 72.9% (functional recovery) of patients. Because the prediction was slightly pessimistic for patients in the controlled trials, adapting the intercept improved the accuracy to 74.8% (survival) and 74.0% (functional recovery). Novel estimation of parameters, however, yielded no relevant further improvement. CONCLUSIONS: For acute ischemic stroke patients included in controlled trials, our easy-to-apply prognostic models based on age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score correctly predicted survival and functional recovery after 3 months. Furthermore, a simple adaptation helps to adjust for a different prognosis and is recommended if a large data set is available.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An early and reliable prognosis for recovery in strokepatients is important for initiation of individual treatment and for informing patients and relatives. We recently developed and validated models for predicting survival and functional independence within 3 months after acute stroke, based on age and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score assessed within 6 hours after stroke. Herein we demonstrate the applicability of our models in an independent sample of patients from controlled clinical trials. METHODS: The prognostic models were used to predict survival and functional recovery in 5419 patients from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA). Furthermore, we tried to improve the accuracy by adapting intercepts and estimating new model parameters. RESULTS: The original models were able to correctly classify 70.4% (survival) and 72.9% (functional recovery) of patients. Because the prediction was slightly pessimistic for patients in the controlled trials, adapting the intercept improved the accuracy to 74.8% (survival) and 74.0% (functional recovery). Novel estimation of parameters, however, yielded no relevant further improvement. CONCLUSIONS: For acute ischemic strokepatients included in controlled trials, our easy-to-apply prognostic models based on age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score correctly predicted survival and functional recovery after 3 months. Furthermore, a simple adaptation helps to adjust for a different prognosis and is recommended if a large data set is available.
Authors: J L Clua-Espuny; J L Piñol-Moreso; A Panisello-Tafalla; J Lucas-Noll; V F Gil-Guillen; D Orozco-Beltran; M L Queralt-Tomas Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: King Chung Ho; William Speier; Suzie El-Saden; David S Liebeskind; Jeffery L Saver; Alex A T Bui; Corey W Arnold Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2014-11-14
Authors: J Rémi; T Pfefferkorn; R L Owens; C Schankin; S Dehning; T Birnbaum; A Bender; M Klein; J Adamec; H-W Pfister; A Straube; B Feddersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David M Kent; Robin Ruthazer; Carole Decker; Philip G Jones; Jeffrey L Saver; Erich Bluhmki; John A Spertus Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael J Mack; Michael A Acker; Annetine C Gelijns; Jessica R Overbey; Michael K Parides; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Mark A Groh; Alan J Moskowitz; Neal O Jeffries; Gorav Ailawadi; Vinod H Thourani; Ellen G Moquete; Alexander Iribarne; Pierre Voisine; Louis P Perrault; Michael E Bowdish; Michel Bilello; Christos Davatzikos; Ralph F Mangusan; Rachelle A Winkle; Peter K Smith; Robert E Michler; Marissa A Miller; Karen L O'Sullivan; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Eric A Rose; Richard D Weisel; Karen L Furie; Emilia Bagiella; Claudia Scala Moy; Patrick T O'Gara; Steven R Messé Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: William Whiteley; Caroline Jackson; Steff Lewis; Gordon Lowe; Ann Rumley; Peter Sandercock; Joanna Wardlaw; Martin Dennis; Cathie Sudlow Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 11.069