OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the predictive value of myocardial deformation imaging for improvement in cardiac function after revascularization therapy in comparison with contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI). BACKGROUND: Myocardial deformation imaging allows analysis of myocardial viability in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: In 53 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial viability was assessed using pixel-tracking-derived myocardial deformation imaging and ceMRI to predict recovery of function at 9 +/- 2 months follow-up. For each left ventricular segment in a 16-segment model, peak systolic radial strain was determined from parasternal 2-dimensional echocardiographic views using an automatic frame-by-frame tracking system of natural acoustic echocardiographic markers (EchoPAC, GE Ultrasound, Horton, Norway), and the relative extent of hyperenhancement using ceMRI. RESULTS: Of 463 segments with abnormal baseline function, 227 showed regional recovery. Compared with segments showing functional improvement, those that failed to recover had lower peak radial strain (15.2 +/- 7.5% vs. 22.6 +/- 6.3%; p < 0.001) and a greater extent of hyperenhancement (56 +/- 29% vs. 14 +/- 17%; p < 0.001). Using a cutoff of 17.2% for peak systolic radial strain, functional recovery could be predicted with high accuracy (sensitivity 70.2%, specificity 85.1%, area under the curve 0.859, 95% confidence interval 0.825 to 0.893). The predictive value was similar to that of hyperenhancement by ceMRI (sensitivity 71.6%, specificity 92.1%, area under the curve 0.874, 95% confidence interval 0.840 to 0.901, at a cutoff of 43% hyperenhancement). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial deformation imaging based on frame-to-frame tracking of acoustic markers in 2-dimensional echocardiographic images is a powerful novel modality to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the predictive value of myocardial deformation imaging for improvement in cardiac function after revascularization therapy in comparison with contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI). BACKGROUND:Myocardial deformation imaging allows analysis of myocardial viability in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: In 53 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial viability was assessed using pixel-tracking-derived myocardial deformation imaging and ceMRI to predict recovery of function at 9 +/- 2 months follow-up. For each left ventricular segment in a 16-segment model, peak systolic radial strain was determined from parasternal 2-dimensional echocardiographic views using an automatic frame-by-frame tracking system of natural acoustic echocardiographic markers (EchoPAC, GE Ultrasound, Horton, Norway), and the relative extent of hyperenhancement using ceMRI. RESULTS: Of 463 segments with abnormal baseline function, 227 showed regional recovery. Compared with segments showing functional improvement, those that failed to recover had lower peak radial strain (15.2 +/- 7.5% vs. 22.6 +/- 6.3%; p < 0.001) and a greater extent of hyperenhancement (56 +/- 29% vs. 14 +/- 17%; p < 0.001). Using a cutoff of 17.2% for peak systolic radial strain, functional recovery could be predicted with high accuracy (sensitivity 70.2%, specificity 85.1%, area under the curve 0.859, 95% confidence interval 0.825 to 0.893). The predictive value was similar to that of hyperenhancement by ceMRI (sensitivity 71.6%, specificity 92.1%, area under the curve 0.874, 95% confidence interval 0.840 to 0.901, at a cutoff of 43% hyperenhancement). CONCLUSIONS:Myocardial deformation imaging based on frame-to-frame tracking of acoustic markers in 2-dimensional echocardiographic images is a powerful novel modality to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.
Authors: Dennis T L Wong; James D Richardson; Rishi Puri; Adam J Nelson; Angela G Bertaso; Karen S L Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-03-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: John W Petersen; John R Forder; James D Thomas; Lemuel A Moyé; Mark Lawson; Catalin Loghin; Jay H Traverse; Sarah Baraniuk; Guilherme Silva; Carl J Pepine Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-06
Authors: Rafael Kramann; Johanna Erpenbeck; Rebekka K Schneider; Anna B Röhl; Marc Hein; Vincent M Brandenburg; Merel van Diepen; Friedo Dekker; Nicolaus Marx; Jürgen Floege; Michael Becker; Georg Schlieper Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Marco Spartera; Anna Damascelli; Ferenc Mozes; Francesco De Cobelli; Giovanni La Canna Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Kiyotake Ishikawa; Yoshiaki Kawase; Dennis Ladage; Elie R Chemaly; Lisa Tilemann; Kenneth Fish; Javier Sanz; Mario J Garcia; Roger J Hajjar Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Kiyotake Ishikawa; Dennis Ladage; Kleopatra Rapti; Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Ana Maria Garcia-Lopez; Javier Sanz; Roger J Hajjar; Yoshiaki Kawase; Mario J Garcia Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 1.866