Literature DB >> 18402515

Characteristics of and trends in the late-stage biopharmaceutical pipeline.

Paul C Nagle1, Christopher A Nicita, Leslie A Gerdes, Cynthia J Schmeichel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify and characterize biopharmaceutical agents and new indications in late-stage development in the United States as of May 2006. STUDY
DESIGN: Review of drug development databases and other secondary sources.
METHODS: Biopharmaceutical was defined as "any biology-based therapeutic that structurally mimics compounds found within the body." Unique biopharmaceuticals, including new molecular entities or new indications in phase 2 or higher development, were identified and characterized through reviews of the literature, 5 drug development databases, a clinical trial database, and telephone inquiries with manufacturers.
RESULTS: As of May 2006, there were 111 unique biopharmaceuticals in late-stage development for 190 indications. Of 111 unique agents in the pipeline, 87 are new molecular entities, and 24 are already approved for other indications. Overall, 38 disease categories were targeted, and at least 33 physician specialties are likely to be affected. The greatest proportion of agents (43 biopharmaceuticals and 83 indications) target cancer. More than 70% of agents in the pipeline will require administration by a healthcare provider. More than 50% of the indications in the pipeline will require long-term (chronic) treatment (defined as >1 year and excludes cancer).
CONCLUSIONS: The steady growth of the US biopharmaceutical pipeline and consequent anticipated near-term approvals will increasingly affect third-party portfolio decision making. Cost of therapy, identifying the right drug for the right patient, and outcomes-based value should drive that decision process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18402515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  5 in total

1.  Opportunity, resources, and affordability: multistakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Janice L Clarke; Alexis Skoufalos; David B Nash; Eric Toppy
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2009-04

2.  International variability in the reimbursement of cancer drugs by publically funded drug programs.

Authors:  P K Cheema; S Gavura; M Migus; B Godman; L Yeung; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Modeling, simulation, and translation framework for the preclinical development of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Kenneth T Luu; Eugenia Kraynov; Bing Kuang; Paolo Vicini; Wei-Zhu Zhong
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Dabigatran - a case history demonstrating the need for comprehensive approaches to optimize the use of new drugs.

Authors:  Rickard E Malmström; Brian B Godman; Eduard Diogene; Christoph Baumgärtel; Marion Bennie; Iain Bishop; Anna Brzezinska; Anna Bucsics; Stephen Campbell; Alessandra Ferrario; Alexander E Finlayson; Jurij Fürst; Kristina Garuoliene; Miguel Gomes; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Alan Haycox; Krystyna Hviding; Harald Herholz; Mikael Hoffmann; Saira Jan; Jan Jones; Roberta Joppi; Marija Kalaba; Christina Kvalheim; Ott Laius; Irene Langner; Julie Lonsdale; Sven-Äke Lööv; Kamila Malinowska; Laura McCullagh; Ken Paterson; Vanda Markovic-Pekovic; Andrew Martin; Jutta Piessnegger; Gisbert Selke; Catherine Sermet; Steven Simoens; Cankat Tulunay; Dominik Tomek; Luka Vončina; Vera Vlahovic-Palcevski; Janet Wale; Michael Wilcock; Magdalena Wladysiuk; Menno van Woerkom; Corrine Zara; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Translatability score revisited: differentiation for distinct disease areas.

Authors:  Alexandra Wendler; Martin Wehling
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.531

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.