In search of viable strategies to identify selective inhibitors of protein kinases, we have designed a binding assay to probe the interactions of human phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) with potential ligands. Our protocol is based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) and organic dyes. Specifically, we have expressed and purified the catalytic kinase domain of PDK1 with an N-terminal histidine tag [His(6)-PDK1(DeltaPH)]. We have conjugated this construct to CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated with dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA) and tested the response of the resulting assembly to a molecular dyad incorporating an ATP ligand and a BODIPY chromophore. The supramolecular association of the BODIPY-ATP dyad with the His(6)-PDK1(DeltaPH)-QD assembly encourages the transfer of energy from the QDs to the BODIPY dyes upon excitation. The addition of ATP results in the displacement of BODIPY-ATP from the binding domain of the His(6)-PDK1(DeltaPH) conjugated to the nanoparticles. The competitive binding, however, does not prevent the energy transfer process. A control experiment with QDs, lacking the His(6)-PDK1(DeltaPH), indicates that the BODIPY-ATP dyad adsorbs nonspecifically on the surface of the nanoparticles, promoting the transfer of energy from the CdSe core to the adsorbed BODIPY dyes. Thus, the implementation of FRET-based assays to probe the binding domain of PDK1 with luminescent QDs requires the identification of energy acceptors unable to interact nonspecifically with the surface of the nanoparticles.
In search of viable strategies to identify selective inhibitors of protein kinases, we have designed a binding assay to probe the interactions of humanphosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) with potential ligands. Our protocol is based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) and organic dyes. Specifically, we have expressed and purified the catalytic kinase domain of PDK1 with an N-terminal histidine tag [His(6)-PDK1(DeltaPH)]. We have conjugated this construct to CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated with dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA) and tested the response of the resulting assembly to a molecular dyad incorporating an ATP ligand and a BODIPY chromophore. The supramolecular association of the BODIPY-ATP dyad with the His(6)-PDK1(DeltaPH)-QD assembly encourages the transfer of energy from the QDs to the BODIPY dyes upon excitation. The addition of ATP results in the displacement of BODIPY-ATP from the binding domain of the His(6)-PDK1(DeltaPH) conjugated to the nanoparticles. The competitive binding, however, does not prevent the energy transfer process. A control experiment with QDs, lacking the His(6)-PDK1(DeltaPH), indicates that the BODIPY-ATP dyad adsorbs nonspecifically on the surface of the nanoparticles, promoting the transfer of energy from the CdSe core to the adsorbed BODIPY dyes. Thus, the implementation of FRET-based assays to probe the binding domain of PDK1 with luminescent QDs requires the identification of energy acceptors unable to interact nonspecifically with the surface of the nanoparticles.
The outstanding photophysical properties
of semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have encouraged the development of binding
assays, based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), for the
detection of a diversity of biorelevant analytes [1-5]. Some of these sensing protocols are aimed at
the investigation of protein-ligand
interactions relying on FRET in QD-protein-dye
assemblies. For example, the maltose
binding protein (MBP) was
expressed with a C-terminal oligohistidine segment to promote its adsorption on
the surface of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated
with dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA) [6, 7]. By conjugating the dark quencher QSY9 to β-cyclodextrin,
it was shown that titration of the solution containing QD-bound MBP with β-cyclodextrin-QSY9 effectively
quenched the nanoparticle luminescence.
Such a system was further demonstrated to function as a prototype
nanosensor. In fact, the QD luminescence
could be restored on subsequent titration with maltose, which competitively
displaced β-cyclodextrin-QSY9 from the
sugar binding pocket. In principle, a
similar strategy could be invoked for the detection of compounds that
competitively displace an enzyme-bound dye-labeled substrate for use in
high-throughput drug screening assays.Discovering potent and selective
inhibitors of individual members of the protein kinase superfamily has proved
to be a long and arduous task. Whereas a
large number of high affinity inhibitors have been identified, the majority of
such compounds exhibit broad specificity since they typically bind in the ATP-binding
cleft shared among all kinase enzymes [8-10]. The matter is further complicated
by the fact that the protein kinase superfamily is the largest enzyme family
with an estimated 518 members in the human genome [11]. The broad specificity kinase inhibitors are
commonly identified in high-throughput enzymatic screening assays, whereby
kinase activity is monitored by phosphorylation-induced fluorescence changes in
model peptide substrates. Such enzymatic
assays demand active forms of the kinase, which require one or more critical
residues to be phosphorylated.
Inspection of X-ray structures available for the catalytic domains of
different kinases in their phosphorylated and active forms shows highly
homologous structures, especially in the ATP-binding cleft [12]. However,
known structures of catalytic kinase domains in their unphosphorylated and
inactive forms reveal greater divergence of conformational space, which may
better accommodate selective binding of compounds that stabilize inactive
conformations [12]. Thus, we sought to determine whether
competitive displacement of dye-labeled ATP from protein kinase-QD assemblies
could be used as a sensitive assay for the detection of compounds that bind
either active or inactive forms of kinases.The human phosphoinositide-dependent protein
kinase-1 (PDK1) is particularly well suited to initiate development of
QD-mediated competitive binding assays. PDK1
is a member of the AGC subfamily
of serine-threonine protein kinases and is comprised of an N-terminal catalytic
kinase domain and a C-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain [13].
Baculovirus-mediated expression in Sf9
insect cells and affinity purification of the recombinant catalytic domain
construct of PDK1 (residues 51–359) with
an N-terminal His6 tag is well established, and this construct [His6-PDK1(ΔPH)]
exhibits high solution stability [14-16]. His6-PDK1(ΔPH)
catalyzes autophosphorylation of Ser-241 located in its activation or T-loop,
which is the only post-translational modification required
for its kinase function [14-16].
Most interestingly, Ser-241 monophosphorylated His6-PDK1(ΔPH) remains relatively inactive,
and it is ultimately activated by allosteric interaction with a phosphorylated
hydrophobic motif (HM) at the C-terminus of its protein substrate [14-16]. The phosphorylated HM has been termed the “PDK1 interacting fragment” or PIF, and it binds to the PIF pocket on the N-lobe of the PDK1 kinase domain [17-20]. Kinetic studies indicate that His6-PDK1(ΔPH)
approximates a Rapid Equilibrium Random Bi Bi System so that it readily forms a high-affinity
complex with ATP in the absence of protein substrate [15],
as exemplified by the X-ray structure reported for the binary enzyme-nucleotide
complex [14]. In this article, we report the ability of His6-PDK1(ΔPH)
to adsorb on the surface of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated
with DHLA and the interactions of the resulting assemblies with a compound incorporating
an ATP ligand and a BODIPY chromophore within its molecular skeleton.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs were
prepared following literature procedures [21, 22]
and then coated with DHLA according to an established protocol [23]. His6-PDK1(ΔPH) was
expressed using the Bac-to-Bac Baculovirus Expression System (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif, USA) and purified as reported earlier
[24]. BODIPY TR adenosine 5′-triphosphate (BODIPY-ATP) was
purchased from commercial sources (Invitrogen, Inc.). Visible absorption spectra were recorded with
a Varian Cary 100 Bio spectrometer using quartz cells with a path
length of 0.5 cm. Emission spectra were
recorded with a Varian Cary Eclipse spectrometer in aerated solutions and are
uncorrected with the exception of those shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8
Emission spectra of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs
(0.1 μM in borate buffer, pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) in the absence (a) and presence of 1.0 (b), 3.0 (c), 5.0 (d), and 10.0 (e) μM of BODIPY-ATP.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The emission spectrum (a in Figure 1) of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated
with DHLA in borate buffer (pH = 7.4) shows an intense band centered at 600 nm
with a quantum yield of 0.2. The
addition of His6-PDK1(ΔPH) to this dispersion affects the
emissive behavior of the nanoparticles. Specifically,
the luminescence increases with the concentration of His6-PDK1(ΔPH)
(a–f in Figure 1) in agreement with the adsorption of the protein on the surface of
the QDs. Indeed, literature reports [6] demonstrate that the coating of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs with
histidine-tagged proteins leads to a luminescence enhancement, as a result of
the significant change in the local environment around the emissive inorganic
particles. In particular, the plot (see Figure 2) of the emission
intensity of our QDs at 600 nm against the relative concentration of His6-PDK1(ΔPH) shows
that saturation is reached at a protein/QD ratio of ca. 30. Under these conditions, the luminescence
quantum yield of the nanoparticles is 0.4.
Figure 1
Emission spectra of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM in
borate buffer, pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) coated with DHLA in the absence (a) and presence of 0.5 (b), 1.0 (c), 2.0 (d), 5.0 (e), and 10.0 (f) μM of His6-PDK1(ΔPH).
Figure 2
Emission intensity at 600 nm of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM in
borate buffer, pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) coated with DHLA against the ratio between the concentration of His6-PDK1(ΔPH) and that of the QDs.
The absorption spectrum (a in Figure 3) of BODIPY-ATP shows an
intense band for the fluorescent component of this dyad in the visible region. This absorption is positioned in the same
range of wavelengths where our QDs emit (b in Figure 3) with an overlap integral of 5.3·10−13 M−1cm3,
suggesting that the BODIPY dye can accept the excitation energy of these
nanoparticles. The overlap integral (J) was calculated from the emission intensity (I) of the quantum dots, the molar extinction coefficient (ε) of the BODIPY dye and the wavelength (λ) using
Thus, the supramolecular
association of the ATP fragment of the dyad with the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)
coating of the QDs can be exploited to bring the BODIPY fluorophore in close
proximity to the nanoparticles and encourage the transfer of energy from the
emissive CdSe core to the organic dye (a in Figure 4). Indeed, the addition of increasing amounts of BODIPY-ATP to the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD conjugate alters
significantly the emission spectrum (a–g in Figure 5). In particular, the
emission band of the QDs at 600 nm fades with an increase in the concentration
of BODIPY-ATP. Concomitantly, a second band for the BODIPY
fluorophore grows at 624 nm in agreement with the expected transfer of energy
from the nanoparticles to the organic dye upon excitation.
Figure 3
Absorption spectrum (a)
of BODIPY-ATP (30 μM)
and emission spectrum (b) of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM)
and His6-PDK1(ΔPH) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm).
Figure 4
The supramolecular association of
BODIPY-ATP with His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD encourages the
transfer of energy from QD to BODIPY upon excitation (a). ATP displaces BODIPY-ATP from the recognition
site of His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD and is
expected to prevent energy transfer (b).
The nonspecific adsorption of BODIPY-ATP on the
surface of QD, however, can also encourage energy transfer (c). Under these conditions, the displacement of
BODIPY-ATP by ATP is not
sufficient to prevent energy transfer.
Figure 5
Emission spectra of a dispersion of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM)
and His6-PDK1(ΔPH) (10 μM) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) in the absence (a) and presence of 1.0 (b), 3.0 (c), 5.0 (d),
10.0 (e), 20.0 (f), and 30.0 (g) μM of BODIPY-ATP.
In principle, the addition of a ligand able to displace BODIPY-ATP from the complementary recognition site of the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD conjugate should result in the physical separation of the nanoparticle donor from the
BODIPY acceptor and, therefore, suppress the energy transfer processes (b in
Figure 4). Consistently, the addition
of increasing amounts of ATP to a solution of the complex formed between BODIPY-ATP and His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD causes a decrease in emission intensity with a concomitant hypsochromic shift (a–f in Figure 6). Instead, the titration of a dispersion of the QDs (0.1 μM) with ATP (0–30 μM) has no influence on their emission spectrum. The deconvolution of the
final spectrum (a in Figure 7) shows the observed emission to be the sum of two
distinct bands (b and c in Figure 7). One of them (b in Figure 7) is centered at 600 nm, corresponds to the emission of the QDs, and its intensity is significantly smaller than that recorded for a dispersion of the QDs alone (d in Figure 7) under otherwise
identical conditions. The other band (c in Figure 7) is
centered at 624 nm, corresponds to the emission of the BODIPY dyes, and its intensity is greater than
that recorded for BODIPY-ATP alone (e in Figure 7) under otherwise identical conditions. Thus, the QDs recover their luminescence only
in part, even after the addition of a relatively large amount of ATP, and still
sensitize the emission of the BODIPY dyes under these conditions. These observations suggest that a fraction of
the BODIPY-ATP conjugates remains
associated with the QDs even in the presence of an excess of ATP (c and d in Figure 4). In agreement with this
interpretation, the addition of increasing amounts of BODIPY-ATP to a
dispersion of QDs leads to the disappearance of the nanoparticle emission at
600 nm with the concomitant appearance of the BODIPY emission at 624 nm (a–e in Figure 8). Hence, the BODIPY-ATP can accept
the excitation energy of the QDs despite the absence of the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)
coating around the nanoparticles. These results
suggest that the BODIPY-ATP conjugate can
adsorb nonspecifically on the QDs, presumably, as a result of interactions between the chromophoric
component and the surface of the nanoparticles.
Figure 6
Emission spectra of a mixture of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM),
His6-PDK1(ΔPH) (10 μM) and BODIPY-ATP (10 μM) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) in the absence (a) and presence of 1 (b),
3 (c), 11 (d), 31 (e), and 301 (f) μM of ATP.
Figure 7
Emission spectra of a mixture of
CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM),
His6-PDK1(ΔPH) (10 μM), BODIPY-ATP (10 μM)
and ATP (301 μM) (a) CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM) (d)
and BODIPY-ATP (10 μM) (e)
in borate buffer (pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm). Deconvolution (b and c)
of trace a.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The incubation of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs, coated
with DHLA, and His6-PDK1(ΔPH) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4) leads to
the adsorption of proteins on the surface of the nanoparticles with a
concomitant luminescence enhancement. The
dependence of the emission intensity on the protein concentration suggests that
an average of ca. 30 proteins adsorb on each QD. The exposure of the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD conjugate to a
BODIPY-ATP dyad brings
the inorganic nanoparticle in close proximity to the BODIPY chromophore,
encouraging the transfer of energy from the former to the latter. Consistently, the emission band of the QDs
fades, as the concentration of BODIPY-ATP increases,
with the concomitant growth of an emission band for organic dye. The competitive binding of ATP, however,
restores the nanoparticle luminescence only in part. Indeed, control experiments show the
occurrence of energy transfer between QDs lacking the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)
shell and BODIPY-ATP. These observations suggest that the organic
chromophore adsorbs nonspecifically on the surface of the nanoparticles. Thus, the development of binding assays for
PDK1 based on QDs and FRET demands the identification of strategies to prevent
the direct adsorption of the energy acceptor on the surface of the nanoparticle
donor.
Authors: Ellen R Goldman; Igor L Medintz; Jessica L Whitley; Andrew Hayhurst; Aaron R Clapp; H Tetsuo Uyeda; Jeffrey R Deschamps; Michael E Lassman; Hedi Mattoussi Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2005-05-11 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: D R Alessi; M Deak; A Casamayor; F B Caudwell; N Morrice; D G Norman; P Gaffney; C B Reese; C N MacDougall; D Harbison; A Ashworth; M Bownes Journal: Curr Biol Date: 1997-10-01 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Igor L Medintz; Aaron R Clapp; Hedi Mattoussi; Ellen R Goldman; Brent Fisher; J Matthew Mauro Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2003-08-24 Impact factor: 43.841