Literature DB >> 18401236

The accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometers in the ambulatory setting.

Timothy A Moore1, Alexey V Sorokin, Colin Hirst, Sherell Thornton-Thompson, Paul D Thompson.   

Abstract

The mercury sphygmomanometer is the undisputed gold standard for the indirect measurement of blood pressure. Some public health advocates have recently expressed concern about the use of mercury in medical practice.(2) This concern has prompted many medical facilities to replace mercury manometers with aneroid devices. The present report examined the performance of 282 aneroid sphygmomanometers in outpatient medical practices. Results were examined for predetermined end points within +/-3 mm Hg from the reference values and to indicate zero at no pressure. Ninety-three devices (33%) failed to perform at > or = 1 pressure levels. Most (76%) of the failures were due to low readings. Only 7 of the 93 failing units did not rest at zero, making this an unreliable indicator of accuracy. Inaccurate readings of aneroid sphygmomanometers may result in a failure to diagnose and treat hypertension, thereby placing hypertensive patients at risk for end-organ damage and cardiovascular events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18401236     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7141.2008.06600.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 1520-037X


  2 in total

1.  The extent of inaccurate aneroid sphygmomanometers in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Dimitri A Cozanitis; Christopher J Jones
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.