Literature DB >> 18401073

The hydraulic conductivity of Matrigel.

William J McCarty1, Mark Johnson.   

Abstract

In this study, we measured the specific hydraulic conductivity (K) of Matrigel at 1% and 2% concentrations as a function of perfusion pressure (0 to 100 mmHg) and compared the results to predictions from two models: a fiber matrix model that predicted K of the gel based upon its composition, and a biphasic model that predicted changes in K caused by pressure induced compaction of the gels. The extent of gel compaction as a function of perfusion pressure was also assessed, allowing us to estimate the stiffness of the gels. As expected, 2% Matrigel had a lower K and a higher stiffness than did 1% Matrigel. Measured values of K of both 1% and 2% Matrigel samples showed good agreement with the predictions of the fiber matrix model. Pressure-induced changes in K were better described by the biphasic model than a model in which uniform compression of the gel was assumed. We conclude that K of multi-component gels, such as Matrigel can be well characterized by fiber matrix models, and that pressure-induced changes in K of such gels can be well characterized by biphasic models.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18401073      PMCID: PMC2562030     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biorheology        ISSN: 0006-355X            Impact factor:   1.875


  21 in total

1.  A biphasic, anisotropic model of the aortic wall.

Authors:  M Johnson; J M Tarbell
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Hydraulic conductivity of basement membrane with computed values for fiber radius and void volume ratio.

Authors:  M A Katz; T Barrette; M Krasovich
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-11

Review 3.  Breast tissue engineering.

Authors:  Charles W Patrick
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Pressure-permeability relationships in basement membrane: effects of static and dynamic pressures.

Authors:  K Klaentschi; J A Brown; P G Niblett; A C Shore; J E Tooke
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-04

5.  Structures and dynamic motion of laminin-1 as observed by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  C H Chen; D O Clegg; H G Hansma
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-06-02       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Glomerular basement membrane as a compressible ultrafilter.

Authors:  G B Robinson; H A Walton
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.514

7.  Stokes flow through a row of cylinders between parallel walls: model for the glomerular slit diaphragm.

Authors:  M C Drumond; W M Deen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 8.  Structure, composition, and assembly of basement membrane.

Authors:  C P Leblond; S Inoue
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1989-08

9.  The effect of aging and pressure on the specific hydraulic conductivity of the aortic wall.

Authors:  M D Whale; A J Grodzinsky; M Johnson
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.875

10.  Basement membrane macromolecules: insights from atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  C H Chen; H G Hansma
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.867

View more
  6 in total

1.  Passage of low-density lipoproteins through Bruch's membrane and choroid.

Authors:  Zdravka Cankova; Jiahn-Dar Huang; Howard S Kruth; Mark Johnson
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Drivers of transcriptional variance in human intestinal epithelial organoids.

Authors:  Zachary K Criss; Nobel Bhasin; Sara C Di Rienzi; Anubama Rajan; Kali Deans-Fielder; Ganesh Swaminathan; Nabiollah Kamyabi; Xi-Lei Zeng; Harsha Doddapaneni; Vipin K Menon; Deepavali Chakravarti; Clarissa Estrella; Xiaomin Yu; Ketki Patil; Joseph F Petrosino; James C Fleet; Michael P Verzi; Sylvia Christakos; Michael A Helmrath; Sumimasa Arimura; Ronald A DePinho; Robert A Britton; Anthony W Maresso; K Jane Grande-Allen; Sarah E Blutt; Sue E Crawford; Mary K Estes; Sasirekha Ramani; Noah F Shroyer
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Autologous Human Immunocompetent White Adipose Tissue-on-Chip.

Authors:  Julia Rogal; Julia Roosz; Claudia Teufel; Madalena Cipriano; Raylin Xu; Wiebke Eisler; Martin Weiss; Katja Schenke-Layland; Peter Loskill
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 17.521

4.  Effects of particulates and lipids on the hydraulic conductivity of Matrigel.

Authors:  William J McCarty; Melissa F Chimento; Christine A Curcio; Mark Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-06-05

5.  Effect of tumor shape, size, and tissue transport properties on drug delivery to solid tumors.

Authors:  Mostafa Sefidgar; M Soltani; Kaamran Raahemifar; Hossein Bazmara; Seyed Mojtaba Mousavi Nayinian; Majid Bazargan
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.355

6.  Biomimetic hydrogel supports initiation and growth of patient-derived breast tumor organoids.

Authors:  Elisabeth Prince; Jennifer Cruickshank; Wail Ba-Alawi; Kelsey Hodgson; Jillian Haight; Chantal Tobin; Andrew Wakeman; Alona Avoulov; Valentina Topolskaia; Mitchell J Elliott; Alison P McGuigan; Hal K Berman; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; David W Cescon; Eugenia Kumacheva
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.