Literature DB >> 18400741

Sunlight exposure assessment: can we accurately assess vitamin D exposure from sunlight questionnaires?

Catherine A McCarty1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to summarize the peer-reviewed literature in relation to sunlight exposure assessment and the validity of using sunlight exposure questionnaires to quantify vitamin D status. There is greater variability in personal ultraviolet (UV) light exposure as the result of personal behavior than as the result of ambient UV light exposure. Although statistically significant, the correlation coefficients for the relation between personal report of sun exposure and ambient UV light measured by dosimetry (assessment of radiation dose) are relatively low. Moreover, the few studies to assess the relation between sunlight measures and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D show low correlations. These low correlations may not be surprising given that personal factors like melanin content in skin and age also influence cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D. In summary, sunlight exposure questionnaires currently provide imprecise estimates of vitamin D status. Research should be directed to develop more objective, nonintrusive, and economical measures of sunlight exposure to quantify personal vitamin D status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18400741     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/87.4.1097S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  32 in total

1.  Validation of a Sun Exposure Questionnaire Among Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Residing in South Florida.

Authors:  Joel C Exebio; Gustavo G Zarini; Sahar Ajabshir; Janet Antwi; Fatma G Huffman
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-02

2.  Rationale and design of the Study To Understand Fall Reduction and Vitamin D in You (STURDY): A randomized clinical trial of Vitamin D supplement doses for the prevention of falls in older adults.

Authors:  Erin D Michos; Christine M Mitchell; Edgar R Miller; Alice L Sternberg; Stephen P Juraschek; Jennifer A Schrack; Sarah L Szanton; Jeremy D Walston; Rita R Kalyani; Timothy B Plante; Robert H Christenson; Dave Shade; James Tonascia; David L Roth; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Vitamin D Levels in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Before and After Treatment Initiation.

Authors:  Marissa B Savoie; Alan Paciorek; Li Zhang; Erin L Van Blarigan; Nilli Sommovilla; Donald Abrams; Chloe E Atreya; Emily K Bergsland; Hueylan Chern; Robin K Kelley; Andrew Ko; Angela Laffan; Ankit Sarin; Madhulika G Varma; Alan P Venook; Katherine Van Loon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  Vitamin d therapy and cardiovascular health.

Authors:  Suzanne E Judd; Vin Tangpricha
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Lower skin cancer risk in women with higher body mass index: the women's health initiative observational study.

Authors:  Jean Y Tang; Michael T Henderson; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Jessica Kubo; Manisha Desai; Stacy T Sims; Vanita Aroda; Fridtjof Thomas; Anne McTiernan; Marcia L Stefanick
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Determinants of serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D levels in a nationwide cohort of blacks and non-Hispanic whites.

Authors:  Jacqueline Chan; Karen Jaceldo-Siegl; Gary E Fraser
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Vitamin d and the risk of uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Donna Day Baird; Michael C Hill; Joel M Schectman; Bruce W Hollis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D in employees of a Middle Eastern university hospital.

Authors:  M-H Gannagé-Yared; E Helou; V Zaraket; S Abi Akl; L Antonios; M-L Moussalli; S Wakim
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  The Association Between the Genetic VDR SNP c.907+75C>T and Prostate Cancer Risk Is Modified by Tanning Potential.

Authors:  Desta A Beyene; Mohammad R Daremipouran; Victor Apprey; Tammey Naab; Olakunle O Kassim; Robert L Copeland; Yasmine M Kanaan
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

10.  Vitamin D intake determines vitamin d status of postmenopausal women, particularly those with limited sun exposure.

Authors:  Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Amy E Millen; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Shirley A A Beresford; Andrea Z LaCroix; Yingye Zheng; Gary E Goodman; Mark D Thornquist; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.