OBJECTIVE: A growing number of researchers have examined the use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications and herbal or dietary supplements among college students. There is concern about the efficacy and safety of these products, particularly because students appear to use them at a higher rate than does the general public. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The authors administered surveys to college students (N = 201) to assess the frequency of use in the past week. RESULTS: A substantial percentage reported using OTC medications (74.1%), herbal or dietary supplements (70.6%), or both concurrently (61.2%). Dose frequency of OTC medications was the best predictor of self-reported emotional distress in the past week. Higher doses of products containing pseudoephedrine or valerian were associated with self-reported anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: These data further reflect an increasing trend toward self-medication among college students. Investigators must conduct reliability and validity studies to evaluate the clinical utility of the measurement tool developed in this study.
OBJECTIVE: A growing number of researchers have examined the use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications and herbal or dietary supplements among college students. There is concern about the efficacy and safety of these products, particularly because students appear to use them at a higher rate than does the general public. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The authors administered surveys to college students (N = 201) to assess the frequency of use in the past week. RESULTS: A substantial percentage reported using OTC medications (74.1%), herbal or dietary supplements (70.6%), or both concurrently (61.2%). Dose frequency of OTC medications was the best predictor of self-reported emotional distress in the past week. Higher doses of products containing pseudoephedrine or valerian were associated with self-reported anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: These data further reflect an increasing trend toward self-medication among college students. Investigators must conduct reliability and validity studies to evaluate the clinical utility of the measurement tool developed in this study.
Authors: Vibeke Koushede; Ola Ekholm; Bjørn E Holstein; Anette Andersen; Ebba Holme Hansen Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Marília Garcez Corrêa da Silva; Maria Cristina Flores Soares; Ana Luiza Muccillo-Baisch Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 3.295