Literature DB >> 18400345

Prime-boost vaccination with a combination of proteosome-degradable and wild-type forms of two influenza proteins leads to augmented CTL response.

P O Ilyinskii1, A B Meriin, V L Gabai, O P Zhirnov, G Thoidis, A M Shneider.   

Abstract

Targeting viral antigens for proteosomal degradation has previously been proposed as a means for immunogenicity augmentation. However, utilization of modified unstable antigens may be insufficient for potent T-cell cross-presentation by APCs, a mechanism that requires high levels of the antigenic protein. Therefore, we hypothesized that a recombinant vaccine utilizing a combination of proteosome-sensitive and proteosome-resistant versions of an antigen in a prime-boost regimen may provide the most efficient CTL response. To address this hypothesis, we utilized conserved proteosome-resistant influenza A virus proteins M1 and NS1. Unstable versions of these polypeptides were constructed by destroying their 3D structure via truncations or short insertions into predicted alpha-helical structures. These modified polypeptides were stabilized in the presence of the proteosome inhibitor MG132, strongly suggesting that they are degraded via a ubiquitin-proteosome pathway. Importantly, with both M1 and NS1antigens, homologous DNA vaccination with a mixture of unstable and proteosome-resistant wt forms of these proteins resulted in significantly higher CTL activity than vaccination with either wt or degradable forms. The most dramatic effect was seen with NS1, where homologous immunization with a mixture of these two forms was the only regimen that produced a notable elevation of CTL response, compared to vaccination with the wt NS1. Additionally, for M1 protein, heterologous vaccination utilizing the unstable form as prime and wild-type form as boost, demonstrated significant augmentation of the CTL response. These data indicate that combining proteosome-sensitive and proteosome-resistant forms of an antigen during vaccination is advantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18400345      PMCID: PMC2440663          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  75 in total

Review 1.  Understanding presentation of viral antigens to CD8+ T cells in vivo: the key to rational vaccine design.

Authors:  Jonathan W Yewdell; S M Mansour Haeryfar
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 28.527

2.  A cytosolic pathway for MHC class II-restricted antigen processing that is proteasome and TAP dependent.

Authors:  Mona K Tewari; Gomathinayagam Sinnathamby; Deepa Rajagopal; Laurence C Eisenlohr
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2005-02-13       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  An unconventional NLS is critical for the nuclear import of the influenza A virus nucleoprotein and ribonucleoprotein.

Authors:  Jerome F Cros; Adolfo García-Sastre; Peter Palese
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.215

Review 4.  Dendritic-cell immunotherapy: from ex vivo loading to in vivo targeting.

Authors:  Paul J Tacken; I Jolanda M de Vries; Ruurd Torensma; Carl G Figdor
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  Protection and antibody responses in different strains of mouse immunized with plasmid DNAs encoding influenza virus haemagglutinin, neuraminidase and nucleoprotein.

Authors:  Ze Chen; Tomoki Yoshikawa; Shin-Etsu Kadowaki; Yukari Hagiwara; Kazutoshi Matsuo; Hideki Asanuma; Chikara Aizawa; Takeshi Kurata; Shin-Ichi Tamura
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.891

6.  Vaccination with DNA encoding internal proteins of influenza virus does not require CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes: either CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells can promote survival and recovery after challenge.

Authors:  S L Epstein; A Stack; J A Misplon; C Y Lo; H Mostowski; J Bennink; K Subbarao
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.823

7.  RNA binding by the novel helical domain of the influenza virus NS1 protein requires its dimer structure and a small number of specific basic amino acids.

Authors:  W Wang; K Riedel; P Lynch; C Y Chien; G T Montelione; R M Krug
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Enhanced protection against a lethal influenza virus challenge by immunization with both hemagglutinin- and neuraminidase-expressing DNAs.

Authors:  Z Chen; K Matsuo; H Asanuma; H Takahashi; T Iwasaki; Y Suzuki; C Aizawa; T Kurata; S Tamura
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1999-02-26       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Protection against mouse and avian influenza A strains via vaccination with a combination of conserved proteins NP, M1 and NS1.

Authors:  Oleg P Zhirnov; Elena I Isaeva; Tatyana E Konakova; Galini Thoidis; Lyudmila M Piskareva; Irina I Akopova; Alex Kartashov; Anatoly D Altstein; Petr O Ilyinskii; Alexander M Shneider
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 10.  Unveiling the roles of autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity.

Authors:  Beth Levine; Vojo Deretic
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 53.106

View more
  8 in total

1.  Protective Efficacy of the Conserved NP, PB1, and M1 Proteins as Immunogens in DNA- and Vaccinia Virus-Based Universal Influenza A Virus Vaccines in Mice.

Authors:  Wenling Wang; Renqing Li; Yao Deng; Ning Lu; Hong Chen; Xin Meng; Wen Wang; Xiuping Wang; Kexia Yan; Xiangrong Qi; Xiangmin Zhang; Wei Xin; Zhenhua Lu; Xueren Li; Tao Bian; Yingying Gao; Wenjie Tan; Li Ruan
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  The proteosomal degradation of fusion proteins cannot be predicted from the proteosome susceptibility of their individual components.

Authors:  Petr O Ilyinskii; Anatoli B Meriin; Vladimir L Gabai; Evgeny V Usachev; Alexei G Prilipov; Galini Thoidis; Alexander M Shneider
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Universal influenza vaccines: from viruses to nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Lei Deng; Sang-Moo Kang; Bao-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.217

4.  Regulation of Immunogen Processing: Signal Sequences and Their Application for the New Generation of DNA-Vaccines.

Authors:  E S Starodubova; M G Isaguliants; V L Karpov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 5.  Feasibility analysis of p62 (SQSTM1)-encoding DNA vaccine as a novel cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Vladimir L Gabai; Victor I Shifrin
Journal:  Int Rev Immunol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.311

6.  Broad-spectrum anti-tumor and anti-metastatic DNA vaccine based on p62-encoding vector.

Authors:  Franco Venanzi; Victor Shifrin; Michael Sherman; Vladimir Gabai; Oleg Kiselev; Andrey Komissarov; Mikhail Grudinin; Maria Shartukova; Ekaterina A Romanovskaya-Romanko; Yuri Kudryavets; Natalya Bezdenezhnykh; Oleksandra Lykhova; Nadiia Semesyuk; Antonio Concetti; Anatoly Tsyb; Marina Filimonova; Victoria Makarchuk; Raisa Yakubovsky; Andrey Chursov; Vita Shcherbinina; Alexander Shneider
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2013-10

Review 7.  Recalling the Future: Immunological Memory Toward Unpredictable Influenza Viruses.

Authors:  Maria Auladell; Xiaoxiao Jia; Luca Hensen; Brendon Chua; Annette Fox; Thi H O Nguyen; Peter C Doherty; Katherine Kedzierska
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  A novel DNA vaccine technology conveying protection against a lethal herpes simplex viral challenge in mice.

Authors:  Julie L Dutton; Bo Li; Wai-Ping Woo; Joshua O Marshak; Yan Xu; Meei-li Huang; Lichun Dong; Ian H Frazer; David M Koelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.