OBJECTIVES: Multidisciplinary and multifactorial interventions seem to be effective in preventing falls. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention program compared with usual Dutch healthcare in community-dwelling people 65 years of age or older who experienced a fall. METHODS:Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis were performed from a societal perspective. Falls and healthcare utilization were continuously measured for 12 months. Daily functioning and quality of life were measured at baseline, after 4 and 12 months. Bootstrap analyses were performed to estimate uncertainty of the findings and sensitivity analysis to assess the generalizability of assumptions made. RESULTS:One hundred sixty-six participants were randomly allocated to the experimental group and 167 to the control group. The overall response rate was 74 percent. Healthcare and patient and family costs of both groups were comparable. Our analyses showed no effect of the intervention program on falls, daily functioning, or quality of life measures. CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary intervention program to prevent falls was not cost-effective compared with usual care in the Netherlands. Notwithstanding our findings, however, falls still have an important impact on society and individuals in terms of costs and effects. Economic evaluations studying promising interventions to prevent falls, therefore, remain necessary.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Multidisciplinary and multifactorial interventions seem to be effective in preventing falls. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention program compared with usual Dutch healthcare in community-dwelling people 65 years of age or older who experienced a fall. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis were performed from a societal perspective. Falls and healthcare utilization were continuously measured for 12 months. Daily functioning and quality of life were measured at baseline, after 4 and 12 months. Bootstrap analyses were performed to estimate uncertainty of the findings and sensitivity analysis to assess the generalizability of assumptions made. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-six participants were randomly allocated to the experimental group and 167 to the control group. The overall response rate was 74 percent. Healthcare and patient and family costs of both groups were comparable. Our analyses showed no effect of the intervention program on falls, daily functioning, or quality of life measures. CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary intervention program to prevent falls was not cost-effective compared with usual care in the Netherlands. Notwithstanding our findings, however, falls still have an important impact on society and individuals in terms of costs and effects. Economic evaluations studying promising interventions to prevent falls, therefore, remain necessary.
Authors: Geoffrey J Hoffman; Ron D Hays; Martin F Shapiro; Steven P Wallace; Susan L Ettner Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Walter Palmas; Steven Shea; Justin Starren; Jeanne A Teresi; Michael L Ganz; Tanya M Burton; Chris L Pashos; Jan Blustein; Lesley Field; Philip C Morin; Roberto E Izquierdo; Stephanie Silver; Joseph P Eimicke; Rafael A Lantigua; Ruth S Weinstock Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: R Patil; P Kolu; J Raitanen; J Valvanne; P Kannus; S Karinkanta; H Sievänen; K Uusi-Rasi Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Michel H C Bleijlevens; Joseph P M Diederiks; Marike R C Hendriks; Jolanda C M van Haastregt; Harry F J M Crebolder; Jacques Th M van Eijk Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 3.921