PURPOSE: This study evaluated the agreement between clinical and photographic assessment of dental fluorosis (DF) in 73 children during a field study, using portable equipment and a standardising device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dental exam was performed using the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis (TSIF). Photographs of the facial aspects of front teeth and from the occlusal aspect of the mandibular posterior teeth were taken. All photographs were taken following a standard operating procedure. Photographs of anterior and posterior teeth were coded and assigned a random study number. Examiners scored photographs as fluorosis cases or non-cases. RESULTS: Agreement among the clinical examiners ranged from good to excellent. Agreement was also good for the repeated photographic evaluations. In total, 22% of the children were diagnosed with DF during a clinical exam, and 19% were diagnosed with DF using the photographs. CONCLUSIONS: Development of this method aided in the photographic assessment of DF. The photographs obtained were a useful tool for documenting DF, to re-train examiners, and to determine intra- and inter-examiner agreement.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the agreement between clinical and photographic assessment of dental fluorosis (DF) in 73 children during a field study, using portable equipment and a standardising device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dental exam was performed using the Tooth Surface Index of Fluorosis (TSIF). Photographs of the facial aspects of front teeth and from the occlusal aspect of the mandibular posterior teeth were taken. All photographs were taken following a standard operating procedure. Photographs of anterior and posterior teeth were coded and assigned a random study number. Examiners scored photographs as fluorosis cases or non-cases. RESULTS: Agreement among the clinical examiners ranged from good to excellent. Agreement was also good for the repeated photographic evaluations. In total, 22% of the children were diagnosed with DF during a clinical exam, and 19% were diagnosed with DF using the photographs. CONCLUSIONS: Development of this method aided in the photographic assessment of DF. The photographs obtained were a useful tool for documenting DF, to re-train examiners, and to determine intra- and inter-examiner agreement.
Authors: Iain A Pretty; Michael McGrady; Christian Zakian; Roger P Ellwood; Andrew Taylor; Mohammed Owaise Sharif; Timothy Iafolla; E Angeles Martinez-Mier; Patcharawan Srisilapanan; Narumanas Korwanich; Michaela Goodwin; Bruce A Dye Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-05-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ashima Goyal; Mahesh Verma; G S Toteja; K Gauba; Vikrant Mohanty; Utkal Mohanty; Rupinder Kaur Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Antonio Ciardo; Sarah K Sonnenschein; Marlinde M Simon; Maurice Ruetters; Marcia Spindler; Philipp Ziegler; Ingvi Reccius; Alexander-Nicolaus Spies; Jana Kykal; Eva-Marie Baumann; Susanne Fackler; Christopher Büsch; Ti-Sun Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240